KG4PH on 80 Meters - Guantanamo
|
Bill Garwood
3.581.000 500 Hz below W1AW. PSK31 0045 UTC
73,
Bill N4GBK in NC |
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Steve W3HF
Thanks for the spot, Bill. It was hard to get through with two loud CW stations surrounding us, but I got through for a new DXCC on 80. He's still there is anyone is looking. Steve W3HF 3.581.000 500 Hz below W1AW. PSK31 0045 UTC 73, Bill N4GBK in NC |
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Bill Garwood
Steve, yes I saw you calling him..looked like another station was calling at the same time? I have the filters and everything else turned on in the TS-590S and it is still a bit rough copy. W1AW is booming in at S9+40. Would not have got him at all with my old rig.
I hope to find him on 10 or maybe even 160!
73,
Bill From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of Stephen Melachrinos w3hf@... [070] <070@...>
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 12:58 AM To: 070@... Subject: Re: [070] KG4PH on 80 Meters - Guantanamo Thanks for the spot, Bill. It was hard to get through with two loud CW stations surrounding us, but I got through for a new DXCC on 80.
He's still there is anyone is looking.
Steve
W3HF
3.581.000 500 Hz below W1AW. PSK31 0045 UTC
73,
Bill N4GBK in NC |
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Steve W3HF
If there was someone else, I couldn't see him. It was a couple of his CQs after my QSO that KM4PMV showed up on my waterfall. I now have Gitmo on 10 through 80. Given my antenna situation, I doubt I could get to him on 160. 6m might be possible, but not likely at this time of year. Thanks again. Steve W3HF Steve, yes I saw you calling him..looked like another station was calling at the same time? I have the filters and everything else turned on in the TS-590S and it is still a bit rough copy. W1AW is booming in at S9+40. Would not have got him at all with my old rig. I hope to find him on 10 or maybe even 160! 73, Bill From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of Stephen Melachrinos w3hf@... [070] <070@...> Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 12:58 AM To: 070@... Subject: Re: [070] KG4PH on 80 Meters - Guantanamo Thanks for the spot, Bill. It was hard to get through with two loud CW stations surrounding us, but I got through for a new DXCC on 80. He's still there is anyone is looking. Steve W3HF 3.581.000 500 Hz below W1AW. PSK31 0045 UTC 73, Bill N4GBK in NC |
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Bill Garwood
Saw Jerry calling him but Jerry's signal was down almost in the noise here. Maybe he will be back at a later time in the evening.
73,
Bill From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of Stephen Melachrinos w3hf@... [070] <070@...>
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 1:09 AM To: 070@... Subject: Re: Re: [070] KG4PH on 80 Meters - Guantanamo If there was someone else, I couldn't see him. It was a couple of his CQs after my QSO that KM4PMV showed up on my waterfall.
I now have Gitmo on 10 through 80. Given my antenna situation, I doubt I could get to him on 160. 6m might be possible, but not likely at this time of year.
Thanks again.
Steve W3HF
Steve, yes I saw you calling him..looked like another station was calling at the same time? I have the filters and everything else turned on in the TS-590S and it is still a bit rough copy. W1AW is booming in at S9+40. Would not have got him at all with my old rig.
I hope to find him on 10 or maybe even 160!
73,
Bill From:
070@... <070@...> on behalf of Stephen Melachrinos
w3hf@... [070] <070@...>
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 12:58 AM To: 070@... Subject: Re: [070] KG4PH on 80 Meters - Guantanamo Thanks for the spot, Bill. It was hard to get through with two loud CW stations surrounding us, but I got through for a new DXCC on 80.
He's still there is anyone is looking.
Steve
W3HF
3.581.000 500 Hz below W1AW. PSK31 0045 UTC
73,
Bill N4GBK in NC |
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
John Etling
KG4PH has been working PSK for a few days now. Have worked him PSK on 17m on 02-20 and 40m on 02-21. Hopefully he continues to be there for a few more days!!
From: Bill Garwood n4gbk@... [070] [mailto:070@...]
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 19:16 To: 070@... Subject: Re: Re: [070] KG4PH on 80 Meters - Guantanamo
Saw Jerry calling him but Jerry's signal was down almost in the noise here. Maybe he will be back at a later time in the evening.
73,
Bill
From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of Stephen Melachrinos w3hf@... [070] <070@...>
If there was someone else, I couldn't see him. It was a couple of his CQs after my QSO that KM4PMV showed up on my waterfall.
I now have Gitmo on 10 through 80. Given my antenna situation, I doubt I could get to him on 160. 6m might be possible, but not likely at this time of year.
Thanks again.
W3HF
On 02/23/16, Bill Garwood n4gbk@... [070]<070@...> wrote:
Steve, yes I saw you calling him..looked like another station was calling at the same time? I have the filters and everything else turned on in the TS-590S and it is still a bit rough copy. W1AW is booming in at S9+40. Would not have got him at all with my old rig.
I hope to find him on 10 or maybe even 160!
73,
Bill
From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of Stephen Melachrinos w3hf@... [070] <070@...>
Thanks for the spot, Bill. It was hard to get through with two loud CW stations surrounding us, but I got through for a new DXCC on 80.
He's still there is anyone is looking.
Steve W3HF
On 02/23/16,Bill Garwood n4gbk@... [070]<070@...> wrote:
3.581.000 500 Hz below W1AW. PSK31 0045 UTC
73,
Bill N4GBK in NC
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
boat.anchor@...
John
He is just as tough for me as Alan was for you. I have answered his CQs endlessly but he can't hear me at all. Don't want to lift the power above 40W as that would probably put me in that wide signal LID group. Considering he is using a Force 12 C-3S at 65 feet I should be loud to him, but maybe I am trying while he is pointed at EU. Will keep trying Barry ---In 070@..., <john@...> wrote : KG4PH has been working PSK for a few days now. Have worked him PSK on 17m on 02-20 and 40m on 02-21. Hopefully he continues to be there for a few more days!!
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Worked N1LID the other day .... :-) Jerry N9AVY From: "boat.anchor@... [070]" <070@...> To: 070@... Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 9:24 PM Subject: RE: Re: [070] KG4PH on 80 Meters - Guantanamo John He is just as tough for me as Alan was for you. I have answered his CQs endlessly but he can't hear me at all. Don't want to lift the power above 40W as that would probably put me in that wide signal LID group. Considering he is using a Force 12 C-3S at 65 feet I should be loud
to him, but maybe I am trying while he is pointed at EU. Will keep trying Barry ---In 070@..., wrote : KG4PH has been working PSK for a few days now. Have worked him PSK on 17m on 02-20 and 40m on 02-21. Hopefully he continues to be there for a few more days!!
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
John Etling
Barry; I can certainly understand where you are coming from. I am not sure where you are at (State) but guessing in the far upper NW. I suspect Gitmo is about as far away from you as AK is from me… maybe even further, I wish you luck in grabbing him before week’s end, based on earlier posting noting he will be active until the end of the week. I was not boasting about my contacts but just noting he had been on the air from at least 02-20. I was not aware he was a temporary station. Should I happen to spot him again, I will post here. But like you noted earlier… “It’s Easy”!! LOL. … I’m just saying’ 73 de K3JAE John Etling 070 #1820 LONP #321 PODXS 070 – Nobody Special – Just a Member From: "boat.anchor@... [070]" <070@...> Reply-To: <070@...> Date: Monday, 22 February 2016 at 21:24 To: <070@...> Subject: RE: Re: [070] KG4PH on 80 Meters - Guantanamo John He is just as tough for me as Alan was for you. I have answered his CQs endlessly but he can't hear me at all. Don't want to lift the power above 40W as that would probably put me in that wide signal LID group. Considering he is using a Force 12 C-3S at 65 feet I should be loud
to him, but maybe I am trying while he is pointed at EU. Will keep trying Barry |
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Doh! Barry & John, you’ve been “jerried!” ;-) N6MG
From: 070@... [mailto:070@...]
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 8:01 PM To: 070@... Subject: Re: Re: [070] KG4PH on 80 Meters - Guantanamo
Worked N1LID the other day .... :-)
Jerry N9AVY
From: "boat.anchor@... [070]" <070@...>
John He is just as tough for me as Alan was for you. I have answered his CQs endlessly but he can't hear me at all. Don't want to lift the power above 40W as that would probably put me in that wide signal LID group. Considering he is using a Force 12 C-3S at 65 feet I should be loud to him, but maybe I am trying while he is pointed at EU. Will keep trying Barry
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
John Etling
~Faking disbelief~ REALLY??? I’m all broken up.
From: 'Milton Garb' n6mg@... [070] [mailto:070@...]
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 23:03 To: 070@... Subject: RE: Re: [070] KG4PH on 80 Meters - Guantanamo
Doh! Barry & John, you’ve been “jerried!” ;-) N6MG
From: 070@... [mailto:070@...]
Worked N1LID the other day .... :-)
Jerry N9AVY
From: "boat.anchor@... [070]" <070@...>
John He is just as tough for me as Alan was for you. I have answered his CQs endlessly but he can't hear me at all. Don't want to lift the power above 40W as that would probably put me in that wide signal LID group. Considering he is using a Force 12 C-3S at 65 feet I should be loud to him, but maybe I am trying while he is pointed at EU. Will keep trying Barry
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Waht's this "jerried" ? Someone needs to fess up before I drag out the "Wouf Hong & Rettysnitch "  K9ati From: "'Milton Garb' n6mg@... [070]" <070@...> To: 070@... Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 11:03 PM Subject: RE: Re: [070] KG4PH on 80 Meters - Guantanamo Doh! Barry & John, you’ve been “jerried!” ;-) N6MG From: 070@... [mailto:070@...] Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 8:01 PM To: 070@... Subject: Re: Re: [070] KG4PH on 80 Meters - Guantanamo Worked N1LID the other day .... :-) Jerry N9AVY From: "boat.anchor@... [070]" <070@...> To: 070@... Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 9:24 PM Subject: RE: Re: [070] KG4PH on 80 Meters - Guantanamo John He is just as tough for me as Alan was for you. I have answered his CQs endlessly but he can't hear me at all. Don't want to lift the power above 40W as that would probably put me in that wide signal LID group. Considering he is using a Force 12 C-3S at 65 feet I should be loud to him, but maybe I am trying while he is pointed at EU. Will keep trying Barry KG4PH has been working PSK for a few days now. Have worked him PSK on 17m on 02-20 and 40m on 02-21. Hopefully he continues to be there for a few more days!!
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
boat.anchor@...
John
Appreciate all the help I can get. BTW my (state) is British Columbia regards Barry ---In 070@..., <john@...> wrote : Barry; I can certainly understand where you are coming from. I am not sure where you are at (State) but guessing in the far upper NW. I suspect Gitmo is about as far away from you as AK is from me… maybe even further, I wish you luck in grabbing him before week’s end, based on earlier posting noting he will be active until the end of the week. I was not boasting about my contacts but just noting he had been on the air from at least 02-20. I was not aware he was a temporary station. Should I happen to spot him again, I will post here. But like you noted earlier… “It’s Easy”!! LOL. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
John Etling
Barry;
Yeah, I realized that after thinking it over a bit ago – and as my slowly moving, caffeine deficient brain recalls you call British Columbia and all others territories, not states… my blunder!! J
Basing on that info, you’re getting to Gitmo is very much like me getting to AK or the upper territories of your country!! Lots of mumbling under breath, lots of wondering if the antenna is still in the air, lots of FUN!!! LOL J
From: boat.anchor@... [070] [mailto:070@...]
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 10:50 To: 070@... Subject: Re: [070] KG4PH on 80 Meters - Guantanamo
John Appreciate all the help I can get. BTW my (state) is British Columbia regards Barry
Barry;
I can certainly understand where you are coming from. I am not sure where you are at (State) but guessing in the far upper NW. I suspect Gitmo is about as far away from you as AK is from me… maybe even further, I wish you luck in grabbing him before week’s end, based on earlier posting noting he will be active until the end of the week.
I was not boasting about my contacts but just noting he had been on the air from at least 02-20. I was not aware he was a temporary station. Should I happen to spot him again, I will post here. But like you noted earlier… “It’s Easy”!! LOL.
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
David Westbrook
not states/territories -- they're "Primary Administrative Subdivisions"!! At least that's the ADIF terminology :) And then there's "Secondary Administrative Subdivisions" -- in USA that's a county. technical footnote -- the ADIF fields are and .. (and is deprecated; replaced by ). Obviously those are the original field names that stuck, and later on they were defined generically (Primary/Secondary) to apply generally to different countries. --david KJ4IZW On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 12:10 PM, 'John Etling' john@... [070] <070@...> wrote:
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
boat.anchor@...
John
Yes the areas north of 60 are called territories and there are three of them. The middle earth between 49 and 60 are called Provinces and there are ten of them. Nunavut Territory is one of the most sparcely populated areas in the world and catching a callsign (VY0) from there is a real coup. Just checked and there seems to be 48 licenses issued. Northwest Territory (VE8) is almost as tough. I have one SSB and one RTTY and still looking for PSK31. This area has 114 licenses issued. Enough of the talking and time to check 10M Have a great day sun is shining here and just above the horizon. Temp is already up to 4C (38F) Barry ---In 070@..., <john@...> wrote : Barry;
Yeah, I realized that after thinking it over a bit ago – and as my slowly moving, caffeine deficient brain recalls you call British Columbia and all others territories, not states… my blunder!! J
Basing on that info, you’re getting to Gitmo is very much like me getting to AK or the upper territories of your country!! Lots of mumbling under breath, lots of wondering if the antenna is still in the air, lots of FUN!!! LOL J
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
John Etling
WOW, I think I will stick with calling them States and Territories. If I have to say “Primary Administrative Subdivisions”, one of two things will happen; either everyone will continue to believe I have gone further down the road to “nuts” or my tongue will eventually tie itself into a knot. J
But thanks for the “correction” and offer Dave... but I think I prefer the simpler to say terminology!! Political correctness be darned!! LOL
From: David Westbrook dwestbrook@... [070] [mailto:070@...]
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 11:34 To: 070@... Subject: Re: [070] KG4PH on 80 Meters - Guantanamo
not states/territories -- they're "Primary Administrative Subdivisions"!! At least that's the ADIF terminology :) And then there's "Secondary Administrative Subdivisions" -- in USA that's a county.
technical footnote -- the ADIF fields are and .. (and is deprecated; replaced by ). Obviously those are the original field names that stuck, and later on they were defined generically (Primary/Secondary) to apply generally to different countries.
--david KJ4IZW
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 12:10 PM, 'John Etling' john@... [070] <070@...> wrote:
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
boat.anchor@...
John
Calling them Primary Administrative Subdivisions is ADIF terminology. It is not Canadian. They are Provinces and calling them States is not politically incorrect - it is just incorrect. Barry ---In 070@..., <john@...> wrote : WOW, I think I will stick with calling them States and Territories. If I have to say “Primary Administrative Subdivisions”, one of two things will happen; either everyone will continue to believe I have gone further down the road to “nuts” or my tongue will eventually tie itself into a knot. J
But thanks for the “correction” and offer Dave... but I think I prefer the simpler to say terminology!! Political correctness be darned!! LOL
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
boat.anchor@...
Milt
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Not sure I get it but N1LID is also in my log. It is a call you cant resist working. Barry ---In 070@..., <n6mg@...> wrote : Doh! Barry & John, you’ve been “jerried!” ;-) N6MG
From: 070@... [mailto:070@...]
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 8:01 PM To: 070@... Subject: Re: Re: [070] KG4PH on 80 Meters - Guantanamo
Worked N1LID the other day .... :-)
Jerry N9AVY
From: "boat.anchor@... [070]" <070@...>
John He is just as tough for me as Alan was for you. I have answered his CQs endlessly but he can't hear me at all. Don't want to lift the power above 40W as that would probably put me in that wide signal LID group. Considering he is using a Force 12 C-3S at 65 feet I should be loud to him, but maybe I am trying while he is pointed at EU. Will keep trying Barry
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Paul Butzi <kg7stv@...>
N1LID is good but over the weekend I did a little dance when I got David KO0TER in Kansas City, MO.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
-p KG7STV 73, don’t forget to smile and have fun
|
||||||||||||||
|
|