Date   

Re: 17m PSK31

Peter Hiltz
 

I think 17 meters is dead right now.

Pete
WV3S

On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Jerry n9avy@... [070] <070@...> wrote:
 

Me, too... CQing  de  n9avy



From: "Peter Hiltz pmhiltz@... [070]" <070@...>
To: 070@...
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 2:16 PM
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31

 
I'm seeing local qrm, and no signals.  I am calling CQ periodically.

Pete
WV3S

On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 3:03 PM, randy true w4rttrandy@... [070] <070@...> wrote:
 
When tuned to .097 does anyone else have a blob at 1700, or just local qrn?

Randy W4RTT



From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of Jerry n9avy@... [070] <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 2:25 PM
To: 070@...
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
Sounds like an idea !
 
Jerry  n9avy



From: "Peter Hiltz pmhiltz@... [070]" <070@...>
To: 070@...
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 12:53 PM
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31

 
All,

Having noticed the same thing on the bands I'd like to propose we shift down in frequency, as a group, and let our shift of numbers pull a new standard.  Folks will find us and move so as to make contacts.

We can approach this two ways:

a. I've noticed that most signals are not at the bandplan frequencies, but instead up 1.5 KHz.  That is, we're setting our radios to the bandplan frequency which, at least in fldigi, puts you up 1.5 KHz.  If we all subtract 1.5KHz we would be using the actual correct frequency, that is, centered at the bandplan frequency and ranging up or down a bit.

b. We agree as a group to shift down 2 KHz.  That will have the same effect with less confusion, assuming subtracting 1.5 KHz is confusing to some.

If we get the PODs folks to move, others will follow.  We can set a new standard ourselves, which might be easier than convincing the ARRL to update their bandplan.

I'm going to sit on 18.098 MHz on my dial, which puts fldigi looking at 18.0995 MHz.  It looks clear there, and around it.

Pete
WV3S

On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 1:16 PM, tom@... [070] <070@...> wrote:
 
As someone who does both, the FT8 default frequencies are programmed in WSJT-X application (which is still in the release candidate 2 stage for FT8).   The best chance is to get them to change the frequency they use on when the release version (or RC3) comes out by complaining on the group. 

This isn't the only band/mode that has a conflict, I don't FT8 also runs into Olivia on 20 meters.

If your hoping FT8 goes away, I seriously doubt it anytime soon.  It has absolutely dominated every other digital mode for use since it came out.   Even JT65/JT9 modes are pretty dead now, especially JT9.

73,

Tom KN6Q  

---In 070@..., wrote :

I know I am late to the party, but trying on 17m now.....

Fr Richard
WB8YXF


On Monday, October 9, 2017, 11:46:24 AM EDT, 'Steve Case' artcase@... [070] <070@...> wrote:


 
I was there too for the last half hour, CQ'd saw nothing but FT8 sigs. I agree use it or lose it.
Steve
WA7ETE
PNW
#872
 
 
 

From: "randy true w4rttrandy@... [070]" <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2017 8:41 AM
To: "070@..." <070@...>
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
 
Nope, just 20 FT8 signals.
 
Randy W4RTT
 

From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of 'Mike Besemer' mwbesemer@... [070] <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 11:11 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: RE: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
 
Not seeing you.  Can you see me?
 
Mike
WM4B
 
From: 070@... [mailto:070@...]
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 11:02 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
I'm also there
 
Randy W4RTT
 

From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of 'Mike Besemer' mwbesemer@... [070] <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 10:57 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: RE: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
CQing there now.  The FT8 stations moved away from where I’m at.
 
Mike
WM4B
 
From: 070@... [mailto:070@...]
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 10:48 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
I just got into the digi modes a couple years ago, and I settled on PSK31 and have loved it. I did notice that whenever I went up to 17 and called there was seldom anyone around. I have made just a hand full of contacts on 17.
I do work FT8 and have mad many contacts on 17. But I try to keep above .100 because it is "our" freq. I think it was mostly, "hey these guys aren't using it, so lets us use it"
As the old saying says, if you don't use it you will lose it.
 
Randy W4RTT
 

From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of Jerry n9avy@... [070] <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 9:29 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
Probably not, but "venting" feels good.     I am hesitant to join another group after cleaning out several groups people urged me to join.  There were days I'd wake up and have way too many emails to answer; so, I purged many email accounts that held little interest. Just don't want to start down that road again.
 
I'm hoping that once the FT8 people tire of the mode, they'll just go away.
 
Jerry  n9avy
 
 

From: "n7we1980@... [070]" <070@...>
To: 070@...
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 6:11 AM
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
I too feel the frustration with FT-8 "taking over" what had been "our" segment of 17m.  But I doubt posting our concerns here will do much to change that.  May I suggest those of us who feel this is an inappropriate encroachment on the gentlemen's agreement join the WSJT Meteor Scatter and Weak Signal Group  

https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/ groups/wsjtgroup/info

and voice our complaints there?
 
The group's conversations make for interesting reading - particularly the current thread of Expanding the Watering Hole.  Have no doubt - they are coming soon to a frequency we all love and use.  Time to make our voice heard!
 
Rick - N7WE
070 - #1602

 

 
 
 
 
 



--
WV3S
Monitoring 146.52 MHz & the CCARC UHF Repeater





--
WV3S
Monitoring 146.52 MHz & the CCARC UHF Repeater





--
WV3S
Monitoring 146.52 MHz & the CCARC UHF Repeater


Re: NU4C - Paul - Completes 366!

Matthew King - AK4MK
 

Outstanding job, Paul!

The 24/7, 365, 366, and Clock & Calendar awards are some of the toughest awards we offer as they require quite a commitment! What am I saying - you already know this.... the hard way! :-)

The mailing that is currently underway had a cut off of 30SEPT, so your awards will go out in the next mailing, right at the first of the year.

CONGRATULATIONS!

73

Matt King
AK4MK - 070 #1708
PODXS 070 Club Executive Director





On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 6:47 AM, n7we1980@... [070] <070@...> wrote:
 

He did it!  On 10/8 NU4C - Paul - completed his 366.  He is only the 21st person of 2570+ members to do so.  Congratulations Paul.  Well done!


Paul had previously completed the 24/7 endorsement.  Therefore, he also earned the Clock and Calendar Endorsement for working every day of the year, Leap Day, and every hour block of every day of the week.  He is only the 13th person to reach this phenomenal milestone!


It wasn't easy but he did it!  Please join me in congratulating him on this fine accomplishment!


Rick Butz
N7WE - 070 #1602

PODXS 070 Public Relations Director





Re: 17m PSK31

Jerry N9AVY
 

Me, too... CQing  de  n9avy

From: "Peter Hiltz pmhiltz@gmail.com [070]" <070@yahoogroups.com>
To: 070@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 2:16 PM
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31

  I'm seeing local qrm, and no signals.  I am calling CQ periodically.
PeteWV3S
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 3:03 PM, randy true w4rttrandy@outlook.com [070] <070@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

  When tuned to .097 does anyone else have a blob at 1700, or just local qrn?

Randy W4RTT


From: 070@yahoogroups.com <070@yahoogroups.com> on behalf of Jerry n9avy@sbcglobal.net [070] <070@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 2:25 PM
To: 070@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31  Sounds like an idea ! Jerry  n9avy

From: "Peter Hiltz pmhiltz@gmail.com [070]" <070@yahoogroups.com>
To: 070@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 12:53 PM
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31

 All,
Having noticed the same thing on the bands I'd like to propose we shift down in frequency, as a group, and let our shift of numbers pull a new standard.  Folks will find us and move so as to make contacts.
We can approach this two ways:
a. I've noticed that most signals are not at the bandplan frequencies, but instead up 1.5 KHz.  That is, we're setting our radios to the bandplan frequency which, at least in fldigi, puts you up 1.5 KHz.  If we all subtract 1.5KHz we would be using the actual correct frequency, that is, centered at the bandplan frequency and ranging up or down a bit.
b. We agree as a group to shift down 2 KHz.  That will have the same effect with less confusion, assuming subtracting 1.5 KHz is confusing to some.
If we get the PODs folks to move, others will follow.  We can set a new standard ourselves, which might be easier than convincing the ARRL to update their bandplan.
I'm going to sit on 18.098 MHz on my dial, which puts fldigi looking at 18.0995 MHz.  It looks clear there, and around it.
PeteWV3S
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 1:16 PM, tom@kn6q.org [070] <070@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 As someone who does both, the FT8 default frequencies are programmed in WSJT-X application (which is still in the release candidate 2 stage for FT8).   The best chance is to get them to change the frequency they use on when the release version (or RC3) comes out by complaining on the group. 
This isn't the only band/mode that has a conflict, I don't FT8 also runs into Olivia on 20 meters.

If your hoping FT8 goes away, I seriously doubt it anytime soon.  It has absolutely dominated every other digital mode for use since it came out.   Even JT65/JT9 modes are pretty dead now, especially JT9.
73,
Tom KN6Q  

---In 070@yahoogroups.com, <rickocr2005@...> wrote :

I know I am late to the party, but trying on 17m now.....

Fr Richard
WB8YXF



On Monday, October 9, 2017, 11:46:24 AM EDT, 'Steve Case' artcase@... [070] <070@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 I was there too for the last half hour, CQ'd saw nothing but FT8 sigs. I agree use it or lose it.SteveWA7ETEPNW#872   From: "randy true w4rttrandy@... [070]" <070@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2017 8:41 AM
To: "070@yahoogroups.com" <070@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31   Nope, just 20 FT8 signals. Randy W4RTT From:070@yahoogroups.com <070@yahoogroups.com> on behalf of 'Mike Besemer' mwbesemer@... [070] <070@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 11:11 AM
To: 070@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [070] 17m PSK31   Not seeing you.  Can you see me? MikeWM4B From: 070@yahoogroups.com [mailto:070@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 11:02 AM
To: 070@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31  I'm also there Randy W4RTT From:070@yahoogroups.com <070@yahoogroups.com> on behalf of 'Mike Besemer'mwbesemer@... [070] <070@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 10:57 AM
To: 070@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [070] 17m PSK31    CQing there now.  The FT8 stations moved away from where I’m at. MikeWM4B From:070@yahoogroups.com [mailto:070@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 10:48 AM
To: 070@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31   I just got into the digi modes a couple years ago, and I settled on PSK31 and have loved it. I did notice that whenever I went up to 17 and called there was seldom anyone around. I have made just a hand full of contacts on 17.I do work FT8 and have mad many contacts on 17. But I try to keep above .100 because it is "our" freq. I think it was mostly, "hey these guys aren't using it, so lets us use it"As the old saying says, if you don't use it you will lose it. Randy W4RTT From:070@yahoogroups.com <070@yahoogroups.com> on behalf of Jerryn9avy@... [070] <070@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 9:29 AM
To: 070@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31    Probably not, but "venting" feels good.     I am hesitant to join another group after cleaning out several groups people urged me to join.  There were days I'd wake up and have way too many emails to answer; so, I purged many email accounts that held little interest. Just don't want to start down that road again. I'm hoping that once the FT8 people tire of the mode, they'll just go away. Jerry  n9avy  From: "n7we1980@... [070]" <070@yahoogroups.com>
To: 070@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 6:11 AM
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31   I too feel the frustration with FT-8 "taking over" what had been "our" segment of 17m.  But I doubt posting our concerns here will do much to change that.  May I suggest those of us who feel this is an inappropriate encroachment on the gentlemen's agreement join the WSJT Meteor Scatter and Weak Signal Group  
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/ groups/wsjtgroup/info
and voice our complaints there? The group's conversations make for interesting reading - particularly the current thread of Expanding the Watering Hole.  Have no doubt - they are coming soon to a frequency we all love and use.  Time to make our voice heard! Rick - N7WE070 - #1602
 
     



--
WV3SMonitoring 146.52 MHz & the CCARC UHF Repeater





--
WV3SMonitoring 146.52 MHz & the CCARC UHF Repeater #yiv2785975315 #yiv2785975315 -- #yiv2785975315ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv2785975315 #yiv2785975315ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv2785975315 #yiv2785975315ygrp-mkp #yiv2785975315hd {color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0;}#yiv2785975315 #yiv2785975315ygrp-mkp #yiv2785975315ads {margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv2785975315 #yiv2785975315ygrp-mkp .yiv2785975315ad {padding:0 0;}#yiv2785975315 #yiv2785975315ygrp-mkp .yiv2785975315ad p {margin:0;}#yiv2785975315 #yiv2785975315ygrp-mkp .yiv2785975315ad a {color:#0000ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv2785975315 #yiv2785975315ygrp-sponsor #yiv2785975315ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv2785975315 #yiv2785975315ygrp-sponsor #yiv2785975315ygrp-lc #yiv2785975315hd {margin:10px 0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv2785975315 #yiv2785975315ygrp-sponsor #yiv2785975315ygrp-lc .yiv2785975315ad {margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv2785975315 #yiv2785975315actions {font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv2785975315 #yiv2785975315activity {background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv2785975315 #yiv2785975315activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv2785975315 #yiv2785975315activity span:first-child {text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv2785975315 #yiv2785975315activity span a {color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv2785975315 #yiv2785975315activity span span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv2785975315 #yiv2785975315activity span .yiv2785975315underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv2785975315 .yiv2785975315attach {clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 0;width:400px;}#yiv2785975315 .yiv2785975315attach div a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv2785975315 .yiv2785975315attach img {border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv2785975315 .yiv2785975315attach label {display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv2785975315 .yiv2785975315attach label a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv2785975315 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 4px;}#yiv2785975315 .yiv2785975315bold {font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}#yiv2785975315 .yiv2785975315bold a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv2785975315 dd.yiv2785975315last p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv2785975315 dd.yiv2785975315last p span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv2785975315 dd.yiv2785975315last p span.yiv2785975315yshortcuts {margin-right:0;}#yiv2785975315 div.yiv2785975315attach-table div div a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv2785975315 div.yiv2785975315attach-table {width:400px;}#yiv2785975315 div.yiv2785975315file-title a, #yiv2785975315 div.yiv2785975315file-title a:active, #yiv2785975315 div.yiv2785975315file-title a:hover, #yiv2785975315 div.yiv2785975315file-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv2785975315 div.yiv2785975315photo-title a, #yiv2785975315 div.yiv2785975315photo-title a:active, #yiv2785975315 div.yiv2785975315photo-title a:hover, #yiv2785975315 div.yiv2785975315photo-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv2785975315 div#yiv2785975315ygrp-mlmsg #yiv2785975315ygrp-msg p a span.yiv2785975315yshortcuts {font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;}#yiv2785975315 .yiv2785975315green {color:#628c2a;}#yiv2785975315 .yiv2785975315MsoNormal {margin:0 0 0 0;}#yiv2785975315 o {font-size:0;}#yiv2785975315 #yiv2785975315photos div {float:left;width:72px;}#yiv2785975315 #yiv2785975315photos div div {border:1px solid #666666;min-height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;}#yiv2785975315 #yiv2785975315photos div label {color:#666666;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;}#yiv2785975315 #yiv2785975315reco-category {font-size:77%;}#yiv2785975315 #yiv2785975315reco-desc {font-size:77%;}#yiv2785975315 .yiv2785975315replbq {margin:4px;}#yiv2785975315 #yiv2785975315ygrp-actbar div a:first-child {margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;}#yiv2785975315 #yiv2785975315ygrp-mlmsg {font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;}#yiv2785975315 #yiv2785975315ygrp-mlmsg table {font-size:inherit;font:100%;}#yiv2785975315 #yiv2785975315ygrp-mlmsg select, #yiv2785975315 input, #yiv2785975315 textarea {font:99% Arial, Helvetica, clean, sans-serif;}#yiv2785975315 #yiv2785975315ygrp-mlmsg pre, #yiv2785975315 code {font:115% monospace;}#yiv2785975315 #yiv2785975315ygrp-mlmsg * {line-height:1.22em;}#yiv2785975315 #yiv2785975315ygrp-mlmsg #yiv2785975315logo {padding-bottom:10px;}#yiv2785975315 #yiv2785975315ygrp-msg p a {font-family:Verdana;}#yiv2785975315 #yiv2785975315ygrp-msg p#yiv2785975315attach-count span {color:#1E66AE;font-weight:700;}#yiv2785975315 #yiv2785975315ygrp-reco #yiv2785975315reco-head {color:#ff7900;font-weight:700;}#yiv2785975315 #yiv2785975315ygrp-reco {margin-bottom:20px;padding:0px;}#yiv2785975315 #yiv2785975315ygrp-sponsor #yiv2785975315ov li a {font-size:130%;text-decoration:none;}#yiv2785975315 #yiv2785975315ygrp-sponsor #yiv2785975315ov li {font-size:77%;list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;}#yiv2785975315 #yiv2785975315ygrp-sponsor #yiv2785975315ov ul {margin:0;padding:0 0 0 8px;}#yiv2785975315 #yiv2785975315ygrp-text {font-family:Georgia;}#yiv2785975315 #yiv2785975315ygrp-text p {margin:0 0 1em 0;}#yiv2785975315 #yiv2785975315ygrp-text tt {font-size:120%;}#yiv2785975315 #yiv2785975315ygrp-vital ul li:last-child {border-right:none !important;}#yiv2785975315


Re: 17m PSK31

Jerry N9AVY
 

Nope,  might be a " birdie"  in your receiver.
 
Jerry  n9avy



From: "randy true w4rttrandy@... [070]" <070@...>
To: "070@..." <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 2:03 PM
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31

 
When tuned to .097 does anyone else have a blob at 1700, or just local qrn?

Randy W4RTT



From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of Jerry n9avy@... [070] <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 2:25 PM
To: 070@...
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
Sounds like an idea !
 
Jerry  n9avy



From: "Peter Hiltz pmhiltz@... [070]" <070@...>
To: 070@...
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 12:53 PM
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31

 
All,

Having noticed the same thing on the bands I'd like to propose we shift down in frequency, as a group, and let our shift of numbers pull a new standard.  Folks will find us and move so as to make contacts.

We can approach this two ways:

a. I've noticed that most signals are not at the bandplan frequencies, but instead up 1.5 KHz.  That is, we're setting our radios to the bandplan frequency which, at least in fldigi, puts you up 1.5 KHz.  If we all subtract 1.5KHz we would be using the actual correct frequency, that is, centered at the bandplan frequency and ranging up or down a bit.

b. We agree as a group to shift down 2 KHz.  That will have the same effect with less confusion, assuming subtracting 1.5 KHz is confusing to some.

If we get the PODs folks to move, others will follow.  We can set a new standard ourselves, which might be easier than convincing the ARRL to update their bandplan.

I'm going to sit on 18.098 MHz on my dial, which puts fldigi looking at 18.0995 MHz.  It looks clear there, and around it.

Pete
WV3S

On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 1:16 PM, tom@... [070] <070@...> wrote:
 
As someone who does both, the FT8 default frequencies are programmed in WSJT-X application (which is still in the release candidate 2 stage for FT8).   The best chance is to get them to change the frequency they use on when the release version (or RC3) comes out by complaining on the group. 

This isn't the only band/mode that has a conflict, I don't FT8 also runs into Olivia on 20 meters.

If your hoping FT8 goes away, I seriously doubt it anytime soon.  It has absolutely dominated every other digital mode for use since it came out.   Even JT65/JT9 modes are pretty dead now, especially JT9.

73,

Tom KN6Q  

---In 070@..., wrote :

I know I am late to the party, but trying on 17m now.....

Fr Richard
WB8YXF


On Monday, October 9, 2017, 11:46:24 AM EDT, 'Steve Case' artcase@... [070] <070@...> wrote:


 
I was there too for the last half hour, CQ'd saw nothing but FT8 sigs. I agree use it or lose it.
Steve
WA7ETE
PNW
#872
 
 
 

From: "randy true w4rttrandy@... [070]" <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2017 8:41 AM
To: "070@..." <070@...>
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
 
Nope, just 20 FT8 signals.
 
Randy W4RTT
 

From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of 'Mike Besemer' mwbesemer@... [070] <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 11:11 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: RE: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
 
Not seeing you.  Can you see me?
 
Mike
WM4B
 
From: 070@... [mailto:070@...]
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 11:02 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
I'm also there
 
Randy W4RTT
 

From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of 'Mike Besemer' mwbesemer@... [070] <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 10:57 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: RE: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
CQing there now.  The FT8 stations moved away from where I’m at.
 
Mike
WM4B
 
From: 070@... [mailto:070@...]
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 10:48 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
I just got into the digi modes a couple years ago, and I settled on PSK31 and have loved it. I did notice that whenever I went up to 17 and called there was seldom anyone around. I have made just a hand full of contacts on 17.
I do work FT8 and have mad many contacts on 17. But I try to keep above .100 because it is "our" freq. I think it was mostly, "hey these guys aren't using it, so lets us use it"
As the old saying says, if you don't use it you will lose it.
 
Randy W4RTT
 

From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of Jerry n9avy@... [070] <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 9:29 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
Probably not, but "venting" feels good.     I am hesitant to join another group after cleaning out several groups people urged me to join.  There were days I'd wake up and have way too many emails to answer; so, I purged many email accounts that held little interest. Just don't want to start down that road again.
 
I'm hoping that once the FT8 people tire of the mode, they'll just go away.
 
Jerry  n9avy
 
 

From: "n7we1980@... [070]" <070@...>
To: 070@...
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 6:11 AM
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
I too feel the frustration with FT-8 "taking over" what had been "our" segment of 17m.  But I doubt posting our concerns here will do much to change that.  May I suggest those of us who feel this is an inappropriate encroachment on the gentlemen's agreement join the WSJT Meteor Scatter and Weak Signal Group  

https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/ groups/wsjtgroup/info

and voice our complaints there?
 
The group's conversations make for interesting reading - particularly the current thread of Expanding the Watering Hole.  Have no doubt - they are coming soon to a frequency we all love and use.  Time to make our voice heard!
 
Rick - N7WE
070 - #1602

 

 
 
 
 
 



--
WV3S
Monitoring 146.52 MHz & the CCARC UHF Repeater





Re: NU4C - Paul - Completes 366!

Jeff Cartnal
 

Congrats,  Paul!

Jeff WM9F 1732


From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of n7we1980@... [070] <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 5:47:15 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: [070] NU4C - Paul - Completes 366!
 
 

He did it!  On 10/8 NU4C - Paul - completed his 366.  He is only the 21st person of 2570+ members to do so.  Congratulations Paul.  Well done!


Paul had previously completed the 24/7 endorsement.  Therefore, he also earned the Clock and Calendar Endorsement for working every day of the year, Leap Day, and every hour block of every day of the week.  He is only the 13th person to reach this phenomenal milestone!


It wasn't easy but he did it!  Please join me in congratulating him on this fine accomplishment!


Rick Butz
N7WE - 070 #1602

PODXS 070 Public Relations Director




Re: 17m PSK31

Richard Rohrer
 

On 18.078 calling CQ from FL



73

Dick

KC3EF



From: 070@yahoogroups.com [mailto:070@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 2:54 PM
To: 070@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31





I've moved to 18.097.



Pete



On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Jerry n9avy@sbcglobal.net <mailto:n9avy@sbcglobal.net> [070] <070@yahoogroups.com <mailto:070@yahoogroups.com> > wrote:



Moved down to 18.098 and it's definitely quieter, buy there are still FT8 signals at very top of waterfall. A move to 18.097 might be a better choice.



Jerry N9AVY




_____


From: "Jerry n9avy@sbcglobal.net <mailto:n9avy@sbcglobal.net> [070]" <070@yahoogroups.com <mailto:070@yahoogroups.com> >
To: "070@yahoogroups.com <mailto:070@yahoogroups.com> " <070@yahoogroups.com <mailto:070@yahoogroups.com> >
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 1:27 PM
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31





Sounds like an idea !



Jerry n9avy




_____


From: "Peter Hiltz pmhiltz@gmail.com <mailto:pmhiltz@gmail.com> [070]" <070@yahoogroups.com <mailto:070@yahoogroups.com> >
To: 070@yahoogroups.com <mailto:070@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 12:53 PM
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31





All,



Having noticed the same thing on the bands I'd like to propose we shift down in frequency, as a group, and let our shift of numbers pull a new standard. Folks will find us and move so as to make contacts.



We can approach this two ways:



a. I've noticed that most signals are not at the bandplan frequencies, but instead up 1.5 KHz. That is, we're setting our radios to the bandplan frequency which, at least in fldigi, puts you up 1.5 KHz. If we all subtract 1.5KHz we would be using the actual correct frequency, that is, centered at the bandplan frequency and ranging up or down a bit.



b. We agree as a group to shift down 2 KHz. That will have the same effect with less confusion, assuming subtracting 1.5 KHz is confusing to some.



If we get the PODs folks to move, others will follow. We can set a new standard ourselves, which might be easier than convincing the ARRL to update their bandplan.



I'm going to sit on 18.098 MHz on my dial, which puts fldigi looking at 18.0995 MHz. It looks clear there, and around it.



Pete

WV3S



On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 1:16 PM, tom@kn6q.org <mailto:tom@kn6q.org> [070] <070@yahoogroups.com <mailto:070@yahoogroups.com> > wrote:



As someone who does both, the FT8 default frequencies are programmed in WSJT-X application (which is still in the release candidate 2 stage for FT8). The best chance is to get them to change the frequency they use on when the release version (or RC3) comes out by complaining on the group.



This isn't the only band/mode that has a conflict, I don't FT8 also runs into Olivia on 20 meters.



If your hoping FT8 goes away, I seriously doubt it anytime soon. It has absolutely dominated every other digital mode for use since it came out. Even JT65/JT9 modes are pretty dead now, especially JT9.



73,



Tom KN6Q

---In 070@yahoogroups.com <mailto:070@yahoogroups.com> , <rickocr2005@... <mailto:rickocr2005@...> > wrote :

I know I am late to the party, but trying on 17m now.....



Fr Richard
WB8YXF





On Monday, October 9, 2017, 11:46:24 AM EDT, 'Steve Case' artcase@... [070] <070@yahoogroups.com <mailto:070@yahoogroups.com> > wrote:







I was there too for the last half hour, CQ'd saw nothing but FT8 sigs. I agree use it or lose it.

Steve

WA7ETE

PNW

#872








_____


From: "randy true w4rttrandy@... [070]" <070@yahoogroups.com <mailto:070@yahoogroups.com> >
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2017 8:41 AM
To: "070@yahoogroups.com <mailto:070@yahoogroups.com> " <070@yahoogroups.com <mailto:070@yahoogroups.com> >
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31







Nope, just 20 FT8 signals.



Randy W4RTT




_____


From: 070@yahoogroups.com <mailto:070@yahoogroups.com> <070@yahoogroups.com <mailto:070@yahoogroups.com> > on behalf of 'Mike Besemer' mwbesemer@... [070] <070@yahoogroups.com <mailto:070@yahoogroups.com> >
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 11:11 AM
To: 070@yahoogroups.com <mailto:070@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [070] 17m PSK31







Not seeing you. Can you see me?



Mike

WM4B



From: 070@yahoogroups.com <mailto:070@yahoogroups.com> [mailto:070@yahoogroups.com <mailto:070@yahoogroups.com> ]
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 11:02 AM
To: 070@yahoogroups.com <mailto:070@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31





I'm also there



Randy W4RTT




_____


From: 070@yahoogroups.com <mailto:070@yahoogroups.com> <070@yahoogroups.com <mailto:070@yahoogroups.com> > on behalf of 'Mike Besemer' mwbesemer@... <mailto:mwbesemer@...> [070] <070@yahoogroups.com <mailto:070@yahoogroups.com> >
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 10:57 AM
To: 070@yahoogroups.com <mailto:070@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [070] 17m PSK31





CQing there now. The FT8 stations moved away from where I’m at.



Mike

WM4B



From: 070@yahoogroups.com <mailto:070@yahoogroups.com> [mailto:070@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 10:48 AM
To: 070@yahoogroups.com <mailto:070@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31





I just got into the digi modes a couple years ago, and I settled on PSK31 and have loved it. I did notice that whenever I went up to 17 and called there was seldom anyone around. I have made just a hand full of contacts on 17.

I do work FT8 and have mad many contacts on 17. But I try to keep above .100 because it is "our" freq. I think it was mostly, "hey these guys aren't using it, so lets us use it"

As the old saying says, if you don't use it you will lose it.



Randy W4RTT




_____


From: 070@yahoogroups.com <mailto:070@yahoogroups.com> <070@yahoogroups.com <mailto:070@yahoogroups.com> > on behalf of Jerry n9avy@... <mailto:n9avy@...> [070] <070@yahoogroups.com <mailto:070@yahoogroups.com> >
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 9:29 AM
To: 070@yahoogroups.com <mailto:070@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31





Probably not, but "venting" feels good. I am hesitant to join another group after cleaning out several groups people urged me to join. There were days I'd wake up and have way too many emails to answer; so, I purged many email accounts that held little interest. Just don't want to start down that road again.



I'm hoping that once the FT8 people tire of the mode, they'll just go away.



Jerry n9avy






_____


From: "n7we1980@... [070] <mailto:n7we1980@...%20[070]> " <070@yahoogroups.com <mailto:070@yahoogroups.com> >
To: 070@yahoogroups.com <mailto:070@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 6:11 AM
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31





I too feel the frustration with FT-8 "taking over" what had been "our" segment of 17m. But I doubt posting our concerns here will do much to change that. May I suggest those of us who feel this is an inappropriate encroachment on the gentlemen's agreement join the WSJT Meteor Scatter and Weak Signal Group


<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/>; https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/ groups/wsjtgroup/info


and voice our complaints there?



The group's conversations make for interesting reading - particularly the current thread of Expanding the Watering Hole. Have no doubt - they are coming soon to a frequency we all love and use. Time to make our voice heard!



Rick - N7WE

070 - #1602





















--

WV3S

Monitoring 146.52 MHz & the CCARC UHF Repeater











--

WV3S

Monitoring 146.52 MHz & the CCARC UHF Repeater


Re: 17m PSK31

Peter Hiltz
 

I'm seeing local qrm, and no signals.  I am calling CQ periodically.

Pete
WV3S

On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 3:03 PM, randy true w4rttrandy@... [070] <070@...> wrote:
 

When tuned to .097 does anyone else have a blob at 1700, or just local qrn?


Randy W4RTT




From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of Jerry n9avy@... [070] <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 2:25 PM
To: 070@...
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 

Sounds like an idea !
 
Jerry  n9avy



From: "Peter Hiltz pmhiltz@... [070]" <070@...>
To: 070@...
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 12:53 PM
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31

 
All,

Having noticed the same thing on the bands I'd like to propose we shift down in frequency, as a group, and let our shift of numbers pull a new standard.  Folks will find us and move so as to make contacts.

We can approach this two ways:

a. I've noticed that most signals are not at the bandplan frequencies, but instead up 1.5 KHz.  That is, we're setting our radios to the bandplan frequency which, at least in fldigi, puts you up 1.5 KHz.  If we all subtract 1.5KHz we would be using the actual correct frequency, that is, centered at the bandplan frequency and ranging up or down a bit.

b. We agree as a group to shift down 2 KHz.  That will have the same effect with less confusion, assuming subtracting 1.5 KHz is confusing to some.

If we get the PODs folks to move, others will follow.  We can set a new standard ourselves, which might be easier than convincing the ARRL to update their bandplan.

I'm going to sit on 18.098 MHz on my dial, which puts fldigi looking at 18.0995 MHz.  It looks clear there, and around it.

Pete
WV3S

On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 1:16 PM, tom@... [070] <070@...> wrote:
 
As someone who does both, the FT8 default frequencies are programmed in WSJT-X application (which is still in the release candidate 2 stage for FT8).   The best chance is to get them to change the frequency they use on when the release version (or RC3) comes out by complaining on the group. 

This isn't the only band/mode that has a conflict, I don't FT8 also runs into Olivia on 20 meters.

If your hoping FT8 goes away, I seriously doubt it anytime soon.  It has absolutely dominated every other digital mode for use since it came out.   Even JT65/JT9 modes are pretty dead now, especially JT9.

73,

Tom KN6Q  

---In 070@..., wrote :

I know I am late to the party, but trying on 17m now.....

Fr Richard
WB8YXF


On Monday, October 9, 2017, 11:46:24 AM EDT, 'Steve Case' artcase@... [070] <070@...> wrote:


 
I was there too for the last half hour, CQ'd saw nothing but FT8 sigs. I agree use it or lose it.
Steve
WA7ETE
PNW
#872
 
 
 

From: "randy true w4rttrandy@... [070]" <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2017 8:41 AM
To: "070@..." <070@...>
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
 
Nope, just 20 FT8 signals.
 
Randy W4RTT
 

From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of 'Mike Besemer' mwbesemer@... [070] <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 11:11 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: RE: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
 
Not seeing you.  Can you see me?
 
Mike
WM4B
 
From: 070@... [mailto:070@...]
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 11:02 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
I'm also there
 
Randy W4RTT
 

From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of 'Mike Besemer' mwbesemer@... [070] <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 10:57 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: RE: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
CQing there now.  The FT8 stations moved away from where I’m at.
 
Mike
WM4B
 
From: 070@... [mailto:070@...]
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 10:48 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
I just got into the digi modes a couple years ago, and I settled on PSK31 and have loved it. I did notice that whenever I went up to 17 and called there was seldom anyone around. I have made just a hand full of contacts on 17.
I do work FT8 and have mad many contacts on 17. But I try to keep above .100 because it is "our" freq. I think it was mostly, "hey these guys aren't using it, so lets us use it"
As the old saying says, if you don't use it you will lose it.
 
Randy W4RTT
 

From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of Jerry n9avy@... [070] <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 9:29 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
Probably not, but "venting" feels good.     I am hesitant to join another group after cleaning out several groups people urged me to join.  There were days I'd wake up and have way too many emails to answer; so, I purged many email accounts that held little interest. Just don't want to start down that road again.
 
I'm hoping that once the FT8 people tire of the mode, they'll just go away.
 
Jerry  n9avy
 
 

From: "n7we1980@... [070]" <070@...>
To: 070@...
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 6:11 AM
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
I too feel the frustration with FT-8 "taking over" what had been "our" segment of 17m.  But I doubt posting our concerns here will do much to change that.  May I suggest those of us who feel this is an inappropriate encroachment on the gentlemen's agreement join the WSJT Meteor Scatter and Weak Signal Group  

https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/ groups/wsjtgroup/info

and voice our complaints there?
 
The group's conversations make for interesting reading - particularly the current thread of Expanding the Watering Hole.  Have no doubt - they are coming soon to a frequency we all love and use.  Time to make our voice heard!
 
Rick - N7WE
070 - #1602

 

 
 
 
 
 



--
WV3S
Monitoring 146.52 MHz & the CCARC UHF Repeater





--
WV3S
Monitoring 146.52 MHz & the CCARC UHF Repeater


Re: 17m PSK31

Fr Richard R
 

I seem to have QRN around there


Fr Richard



On Monday, October 9, 2017, 3:03:36 PM EDT, randy true w4rttrandy@... [070] <070@...> wrote:


 

When tuned to .097 does anyone else have a blob at 1700, or just local qrn?


Randy W4RTT




From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of Jerry n9avy@... [070] <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 2:25 PM
To: 070@...
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 

Sounds like an idea !
 
Jerry  n9avy



From: "Peter Hiltz pmhiltz@... [070]" <070@...>
To: 070@...
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 12:53 PM
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31

 
All,

Having noticed the same thing on the bands I'd like to propose we shift down in frequency, as a group, and let our shift of numbers pull a new standard.  Folks will find us and move so as to make contacts.

We can approach this two ways:

a. I've noticed that most signals are not at the bandplan frequencies, but instead up 1.5 KHz.  That is, we're setting our radios to the bandplan frequency which, at least in fldigi, puts you up 1.5 KHz.  If we all subtract 1.5KHz we would be using the actual correct frequency, that is, centered at the bandplan frequency and ranging up or down a bit.

b. We agree as a group to shift down 2 KHz.  That will have the same effect with less confusion, assuming subtracting 1.5 KHz is confusing to some.

If we get the PODs folks to move, others will follow.  We can set a new standard ourselves, which might be easier than convincing the ARRL to update their bandplan.

I'm going to sit on 18.098 MHz on my dial, which puts fldigi looking at 18.0995 MHz.  It looks clear there, and around it.

Pete
WV3S

On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 1:16 PM, tom@... [070] <070@...> wrote:
 
As someone who does both, the FT8 default frequencies are programmed in WSJT-X application (which is still in the release candidate 2 stage for FT8).   The best chance is to get them to change the frequency they use on when the release version (or RC3) comes out by complaining on the group. 

This isn't the only band/mode that has a conflict, I don't FT8 also runs into Olivia on 20 meters.

If your hoping FT8 goes away, I seriously doubt it anytime soon.  It has absolutely dominated every other digital mode for use since it came out.   Even JT65/JT9 modes are pretty dead now, especially JT9.

73,

Tom KN6Q  

---In 070@..., wrote :

I know I am late to the party, but trying on 17m now.....

Fr Richard
WB8YXF


On Monday, October 9, 2017, 11:46:24 AM EDT, 'Steve Case' artcase@... [070] <070@...> wrote:


 
I was there too for the last half hour, CQ'd saw nothing but FT8 sigs. I agree use it or lose it.
Steve
WA7ETE
PNW
#872
 
 
 

From: "randy true w4rttrandy@... [070]" <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2017 8:41 AM
To: "070@..." <070@...>
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
 
Nope, just 20 FT8 signals.
 
Randy W4RTT
 

From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of 'Mike Besemer' mwbesemer@... [070] <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 11:11 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: RE: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
 
Not seeing you.  Can you see me?
 
Mike
WM4B
 
From: 070@... [mailto:070@...]
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 11:02 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
I'm also there
 
Randy W4RTT
 

From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of 'Mike Besemer' mwbesemer@... [070] <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 10:57 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: RE: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
CQing there now.  The FT8 stations moved away from where I’m at.
 
Mike
WM4B
 
From: 070@... [mailto:070@...]
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 10:48 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
I just got into the digi modes a couple years ago, and I settled on PSK31 and have loved it. I did notice that whenever I went up to 17 and called there was seldom anyone around. I have made just a hand full of contacts on 17.
I do work FT8 and have mad many contacts on 17. But I try to keep above .100 because it is "our" freq. I think it was mostly, "hey these guys aren't using it, so lets us use it"
As the old saying says, if you don't use it you will lose it.
 
Randy W4RTT
 

From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of Jerry n9avy@... [070] <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 9:29 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
Probably not, but "venting" feels good.     I am hesitant to join another group after cleaning out several groups people urged me to join.  There were days I'd wake up and have way too many emails to answer; so, I purged many email accounts that held little interest. Just don't want to start down that road again.
 
I'm hoping that once the FT8 people tire of the mode, they'll just go away.
 
Jerry  n9avy
 
 

From: "n7we1980@... [070]" <070@...>
To: 070@...
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 6:11 AM
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
I too feel the frustration with FT-8 "taking over" what had been "our" segment of 17m.  But I doubt posting our concerns here will do much to change that.  May I suggest those of us who feel this is an inappropriate encroachment on the gentlemen's agreement join the WSJT Meteor Scatter and Weak Signal Group  

https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/ groups/wsjtgroup/info

and voice our complaints there?
 
The group's conversations make for interesting reading - particularly the current thread of Expanding the Watering Hole.  Have no doubt - they are coming soon to a frequency we all love and use.  Time to make our voice heard!
 
Rick - N7WE
070 - #1602

 

 
 
 
 
 



--
WV3S
Monitoring 146.52 MHz & the CCARC UHF Repeater



Re: 17m PSK31

Randy True
 

When tuned to .097 does anyone else have a blob at 1700, or just local qrn?


Randy W4RTT




From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of Jerry n9avy@... [070] <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 2:25 PM
To: 070@...
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 

Sounds like an idea !
 
Jerry  n9avy



From: "Peter Hiltz pmhiltz@... [070]" <070@...>
To: 070@...
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 12:53 PM
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31

 
All,

Having noticed the same thing on the bands I'd like to propose we shift down in frequency, as a group, and let our shift of numbers pull a new standard.  Folks will find us and move so as to make contacts.

We can approach this two ways:

a. I've noticed that most signals are not at the bandplan frequencies, but instead up 1.5 KHz.  That is, we're setting our radios to the bandplan frequency which, at least in fldigi, puts you up 1.5 KHz.  If we all subtract 1.5KHz we would be using the actual correct frequency, that is, centered at the bandplan frequency and ranging up or down a bit.

b. We agree as a group to shift down 2 KHz.  That will have the same effect with less confusion, assuming subtracting 1.5 KHz is confusing to some.

If we get the PODs folks to move, others will follow.  We can set a new standard ourselves, which might be easier than convincing the ARRL to update their bandplan.

I'm going to sit on 18.098 MHz on my dial, which puts fldigi looking at 18.0995 MHz.  It looks clear there, and around it.

Pete
WV3S

On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 1:16 PM, tom@... [070] <070@...> wrote:
 
As someone who does both, the FT8 default frequencies are programmed in WSJT-X application (which is still in the release candidate 2 stage for FT8).   The best chance is to get them to change the frequency they use on when the release version (or RC3) comes out by complaining on the group. 

This isn't the only band/mode that has a conflict, I don't FT8 also runs into Olivia on 20 meters.

If your hoping FT8 goes away, I seriously doubt it anytime soon.  It has absolutely dominated every other digital mode for use since it came out.   Even JT65/JT9 modes are pretty dead now, especially JT9.

73,

Tom KN6Q  

---In 070@..., wrote :

I know I am late to the party, but trying on 17m now.....

Fr Richard
WB8YXF


On Monday, October 9, 2017, 11:46:24 AM EDT, 'Steve Case' artcase@... [070] <070@...> wrote:


 
I was there too for the last half hour, CQ'd saw nothing but FT8 sigs. I agree use it or lose it.
Steve
WA7ETE
PNW
#872
 
 
 

From: "randy true w4rttrandy@... [070]" <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2017 8:41 AM
To: "070@..." <070@...>
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
 
Nope, just 20 FT8 signals.
 
Randy W4RTT
 

From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of 'Mike Besemer' mwbesemer@... [070] <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 11:11 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: RE: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
 
Not seeing you.  Can you see me?
 
Mike
WM4B
 
From: 070@... [mailto:070@...]
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 11:02 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
I'm also there
 
Randy W4RTT
 

From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of 'Mike Besemer' mwbesemer@... [070] <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 10:57 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: RE: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
CQing there now.  The FT8 stations moved away from where I’m at.
 
Mike
WM4B
 
From: 070@... [mailto:070@...]
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 10:48 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
I just got into the digi modes a couple years ago, and I settled on PSK31 and have loved it. I did notice that whenever I went up to 17 and called there was seldom anyone around. I have made just a hand full of contacts on 17.
I do work FT8 and have mad many contacts on 17. But I try to keep above .100 because it is "our" freq. I think it was mostly, "hey these guys aren't using it, so lets us use it"
As the old saying says, if you don't use it you will lose it.
 
Randy W4RTT
 

From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of Jerry n9avy@... [070] <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 9:29 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
Probably not, but "venting" feels good.     I am hesitant to join another group after cleaning out several groups people urged me to join.  There were days I'd wake up and have way too many emails to answer; so, I purged many email accounts that held little interest. Just don't want to start down that road again.
 
I'm hoping that once the FT8 people tire of the mode, they'll just go away.
 
Jerry  n9avy
 
 

From: "n7we1980@... [070]" <070@...>
To: 070@...
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 6:11 AM
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
I too feel the frustration with FT-8 "taking over" what had been "our" segment of 17m.  But I doubt posting our concerns here will do much to change that.  May I suggest those of us who feel this is an inappropriate encroachment on the gentlemen's agreement join the WSJT Meteor Scatter and Weak Signal Group  

https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/ groups/wsjtgroup/info

and voice our complaints there?
 
The group's conversations make for interesting reading - particularly the current thread of Expanding the Watering Hole.  Have no doubt - they are coming soon to a frequency we all love and use.  Time to make our voice heard!
 
Rick - N7WE
070 - #1602

 

 
 
 
 
 



--
WV3S
Monitoring 146.52 MHz & the CCARC UHF Repeater



Re: 17m PSK31

Peter Hiltz
 

I've moved to 18.097.

Pete

On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Jerry n9avy@... [070] <070@...> wrote:
 

Moved down to 18.098 and it's definitely quieter, buy there are still FT8 signals at very top of waterfall.  A move to 18.097 might be a better choice.
 
Jerry   N9AVY



From: "Jerry n9avy@... [070]" <070@...>
To: "070@..." <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 1:27 PM
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31

 
Sounds like an idea !
 
Jerry  n9avy



From: "Peter Hiltz pmhiltz@... [070]" <070@...>
To: 070@...
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 12:53 PM
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31

 
All,

Having noticed the same thing on the bands I'd like to propose we shift down in frequency, as a group, and let our shift of numbers pull a new standard.  Folks will find us and move so as to make contacts.

We can approach this two ways:

a. I've noticed that most signals are not at the bandplan frequencies, but instead up 1.5 KHz.  That is, we're setting our radios to the bandplan frequency which, at least in fldigi, puts you up 1.5 KHz.  If we all subtract 1.5KHz we would be using the actual correct frequency, that is, centered at the bandplan frequency and ranging up or down a bit.

b. We agree as a group to shift down 2 KHz.  That will have the same effect with less confusion, assuming subtracting 1.5 KHz is confusing to some.

If we get the PODs folks to move, others will follow.  We can set a new standard ourselves, which might be easier than convincing the ARRL to update their bandplan.

I'm going to sit on 18.098 MHz on my dial, which puts fldigi looking at 18.0995 MHz.  It looks clear there, and around it.

Pete
WV3S

On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 1:16 PM, tom@... [070] <070@...> wrote:
 
As someone who does both, the FT8 default frequencies are programmed in WSJT-X application (which is still in the release candidate 2 stage for FT8).   The best chance is to get them to change the frequency they use on when the release version (or RC3) comes out by complaining on the group. 

This isn't the only band/mode that has a conflict, I don't FT8 also runs into Olivia on 20 meters.

If your hoping FT8 goes away, I seriously doubt it anytime soon.  It has absolutely dominated every other digital mode for use since it came out.   Even JT65/JT9 modes are pretty dead now, especially JT9.

73,

Tom KN6Q  

---In 070@..., wrote :

I know I am late to the party, but trying on 17m now.....

Fr Richard
WB8YXF


On Monday, October 9, 2017, 11:46:24 AM EDT, 'Steve Case' artcase@... [070] <070@...> wrote:


 
I was there too for the last half hour, CQ'd saw nothing but FT8 sigs. I agree use it or lose it.
Steve
WA7ETE
PNW
#872
 
 
 

From: "randy true w4rttrandy@... [070]" <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2017 8:41 AM
To: "070@..." <070@...>
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
 
Nope, just 20 FT8 signals.
 
Randy W4RTT
 

From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of 'Mike Besemer' mwbesemer@... [070] <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 11:11 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: RE: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
 
Not seeing you.  Can you see me?
 
Mike
WM4B
 
From: 070@... [mailto:070@...]
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 11:02 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
I'm also there
 
Randy W4RTT
 

From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of 'Mike Besemer' mwbesemer@... [070] <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 10:57 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: RE: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
CQing there now.  The FT8 stations moved away from where I’m at.
 
Mike
WM4B
 
From: 070@... [mailto:070@...]
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 10:48 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
I just got into the digi modes a couple years ago, and I settled on PSK31 and have loved it. I did notice that whenever I went up to 17 and called there was seldom anyone around. I have made just a hand full of contacts on 17.
I do work FT8 and have mad many contacts on 17. But I try to keep above .100 because it is "our" freq. I think it was mostly, "hey these guys aren't using it, so lets us use it"
As the old saying says, if you don't use it you will lose it.
 
Randy W4RTT
 

From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of Jerry n9avy@... [070] <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 9:29 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
Probably not, but "venting" feels good.     I am hesitant to join another group after cleaning out several groups people urged me to join.  There were days I'd wake up and have way too many emails to answer; so, I purged many email accounts that held little interest. Just don't want to start down that road again.
 
I'm hoping that once the FT8 people tire of the mode, they'll just go away.
 
Jerry  n9avy
 
 

From: "n7we1980@... [070]" <070@...>
To: 070@...
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 6:11 AM
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
I too feel the frustration with FT-8 "taking over" what had been "our" segment of 17m.  But I doubt posting our concerns here will do much to change that.  May I suggest those of us who feel this is an inappropriate encroachment on the gentlemen's agreement join the WSJT Meteor Scatter and Weak Signal Group  

https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/ groups/wsjtgroup/info

and voice our complaints there?
 
The group's conversations make for interesting reading - particularly the current thread of Expanding the Watering Hole.  Have no doubt - they are coming soon to a frequency we all love and use.  Time to make our voice heard!
 
Rick - N7WE
070 - #1602

 

 
 
 
 
 



--
WV3S
Monitoring 146.52 MHz & the CCARC UHF Repeater







--
WV3S
Monitoring 146.52 MHz & the CCARC UHF Repeater


Re: 17m PSK31

Jerry N9AVY
 

Moved down to 18.098 and it's definitely quieter, buy there are still FT8 signals at very top of waterfall.  A move to 18.097 might be a better choice.
 
Jerry   N9AVY



From: "Jerry n9avy@... [070]" <070@...>
To: "070@..." <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 1:27 PM
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31

 
Sounds like an idea !
 
Jerry  n9avy



From: "Peter Hiltz pmhiltz@... [070]" <070@...>
To: 070@...
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 12:53 PM
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31

 
All,

Having noticed the same thing on the bands I'd like to propose we shift down in frequency, as a group, and let our shift of numbers pull a new standard.  Folks will find us and move so as to make contacts.

We can approach this two ways:

a. I've noticed that most signals are not at the bandplan frequencies, but instead up 1.5 KHz.  That is, we're setting our radios to the bandplan frequency which, at least in fldigi, puts you up 1.5 KHz.  If we all subtract 1.5KHz we would be using the actual correct frequency, that is, centered at the bandplan frequency and ranging up or down a bit.

b. We agree as a group to shift down 2 KHz.  That will have the same effect with less confusion, assuming subtracting 1.5 KHz is confusing to some.

If we get the PODs folks to move, others will follow.  We can set a new standard ourselves, which might be easier than convincing the ARRL to update their bandplan.

I'm going to sit on 18.098 MHz on my dial, which puts fldigi looking at 18.0995 MHz.  It looks clear there, and around it.

Pete
WV3S

On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 1:16 PM, tom@... [070] <070@...> wrote:
 
As someone who does both, the FT8 default frequencies are programmed in WSJT-X application (which is still in the release candidate 2 stage for FT8).   The best chance is to get them to change the frequency they use on when the release version (or RC3) comes out by complaining on the group. 

This isn't the only band/mode that has a conflict, I don't FT8 also runs into Olivia on 20 meters.

If your hoping FT8 goes away, I seriously doubt it anytime soon.  It has absolutely dominated every other digital mode for use since it came out.   Even JT65/JT9 modes are pretty dead now, especially JT9.

73,

Tom KN6Q  

---In 070@..., wrote :

I know I am late to the party, but trying on 17m now.....

Fr Richard
WB8YXF


On Monday, October 9, 2017, 11:46:24 AM EDT, 'Steve Case' artcase@... [070] <070@...> wrote:


 
I was there too for the last half hour, CQ'd saw nothing but FT8 sigs. I agree use it or lose it.
Steve
WA7ETE
PNW
#872
 
 
 

From: "randy true w4rttrandy@... [070]" <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2017 8:41 AM
To: "070@..." <070@...>
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
 
Nope, just 20 FT8 signals.
 
Randy W4RTT
 

From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of 'Mike Besemer' mwbesemer@... [070] <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 11:11 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: RE: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
 
Not seeing you.  Can you see me?
 
Mike
WM4B
 
From: 070@... [mailto:070@...]
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 11:02 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
I'm also there
 
Randy W4RTT
 

From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of 'Mike Besemer' mwbesemer@... [070] <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 10:57 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: RE: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
CQing there now.  The FT8 stations moved away from where I’m at.
 
Mike
WM4B
 
From: 070@... [mailto:070@...]
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 10:48 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
I just got into the digi modes a couple years ago, and I settled on PSK31 and have loved it. I did notice that whenever I went up to 17 and called there was seldom anyone around. I have made just a hand full of contacts on 17.
I do work FT8 and have mad many contacts on 17. But I try to keep above .100 because it is "our" freq. I think it was mostly, "hey these guys aren't using it, so lets us use it"
As the old saying says, if you don't use it you will lose it.
 
Randy W4RTT
 

From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of Jerry n9avy@... [070] <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 9:29 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
Probably not, but "venting" feels good.     I am hesitant to join another group after cleaning out several groups people urged me to join.  There were days I'd wake up and have way too many emails to answer; so, I purged many email accounts that held little interest. Just don't want to start down that road again.
 
I'm hoping that once the FT8 people tire of the mode, they'll just go away.
 
Jerry  n9avy
 
 

From: "n7we1980@... [070]" <070@...>
To: 070@...
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 6:11 AM
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
I too feel the frustration with FT-8 "taking over" what had been "our" segment of 17m.  But I doubt posting our concerns here will do much to change that.  May I suggest those of us who feel this is an inappropriate encroachment on the gentlemen's agreement join the WSJT Meteor Scatter and Weak Signal Group  

https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/ groups/wsjtgroup/info

and voice our complaints there?
 
The group's conversations make for interesting reading - particularly the current thread of Expanding the Watering Hole.  Have no doubt - they are coming soon to a frequency we all love and use.  Time to make our voice heard!
 
Rick - N7WE
070 - #1602

 

 
 
 
 
 



--
WV3S
Monitoring 146.52 MHz & the CCARC UHF Repeater





Re: 17m PSK31

Jerry N9AVY
 

Sounds like an idea !
 
Jerry  n9avy



From: "Peter Hiltz pmhiltz@... [070]" <070@...>
To: 070@...
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 12:53 PM
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31

 
All,

Having noticed the same thing on the bands I'd like to propose we shift down in frequency, as a group, and let our shift of numbers pull a new standard.  Folks will find us and move so as to make contacts.

We can approach this two ways:

a. I've noticed that most signals are not at the bandplan frequencies, but instead up 1.5 KHz.  That is, we're setting our radios to the bandplan frequency which, at least in fldigi, puts you up 1.5 KHz.  If we all subtract 1.5KHz we would be using the actual correct frequency, that is, centered at the bandplan frequency and ranging up or down a bit.

b. We agree as a group to shift down 2 KHz.  That will have the same effect with less confusion, assuming subtracting 1.5 KHz is confusing to some.

If we get the PODs folks to move, others will follow.  We can set a new standard ourselves, which might be easier than convincing the ARRL to update their bandplan.

I'm going to sit on 18.098 MHz on my dial, which puts fldigi looking at 18.0995 MHz.  It looks clear there, and around it.

Pete
WV3S

On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 1:16 PM, tom@... [070] <070@...> wrote:
 
As someone who does both, the FT8 default frequencies are programmed in WSJT-X application (which is still in the release candidate 2 stage for FT8).   The best chance is to get them to change the frequency they use on when the release version (or RC3) comes out by complaining on the group. 

This isn't the only band/mode that has a conflict, I don't FT8 also runs into Olivia on 20 meters.

If your hoping FT8 goes away, I seriously doubt it anytime soon.  It has absolutely dominated every other digital mode for use since it came out.   Even JT65/JT9 modes are pretty dead now, especially JT9.

73,

Tom KN6Q  

---In 070@..., wrote :

I know I am late to the party, but trying on 17m now.....

Fr Richard
WB8YXF


On Monday, October 9, 2017, 11:46:24 AM EDT, 'Steve Case' artcase@... [070] <070@...> wrote:


 
I was there too for the last half hour, CQ'd saw nothing but FT8 sigs. I agree use it or lose it.
Steve
WA7ETE
PNW
#872
 
 
 

From: "randy true w4rttrandy@... [070]" <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2017 8:41 AM
To: "070@..." <070@...>
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
 
Nope, just 20 FT8 signals.
 
Randy W4RTT
 

From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of 'Mike Besemer' mwbesemer@... [070] <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 11:11 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: RE: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
 
Not seeing you.  Can you see me?
 
Mike
WM4B
 
From: 070@... [mailto:070@...]
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 11:02 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
I'm also there
 
Randy W4RTT
 

From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of 'Mike Besemer' mwbesemer@... [070] <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 10:57 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: RE: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
CQing there now.  The FT8 stations moved away from where I’m at.
 
Mike
WM4B
 
From: 070@... [mailto:070@...]
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 10:48 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
I just got into the digi modes a couple years ago, and I settled on PSK31 and have loved it. I did notice that whenever I went up to 17 and called there was seldom anyone around. I have made just a hand full of contacts on 17.
I do work FT8 and have mad many contacts on 17. But I try to keep above .100 because it is "our" freq. I think it was mostly, "hey these guys aren't using it, so lets us use it"
As the old saying says, if you don't use it you will lose it.
 
Randy W4RTT
 

From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of Jerry n9avy@... [070] <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 9:29 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
Probably not, but "venting" feels good.     I am hesitant to join another group after cleaning out several groups people urged me to join.  There were days I'd wake up and have way too many emails to answer; so, I purged many email accounts that held little interest. Just don't want to start down that road again.
 
I'm hoping that once the FT8 people tire of the mode, they'll just go away.
 
Jerry  n9avy
 
 

From: "n7we1980@... [070]" <070@...>
To: 070@...
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 6:11 AM
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 
I too feel the frustration with FT-8 "taking over" what had been "our" segment of 17m.  But I doubt posting our concerns here will do much to change that.  May I suggest those of us who feel this is an inappropriate encroachment on the gentlemen's agreement join the WSJT Meteor Scatter and Weak Signal Group  

https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/ groups/wsjtgroup/info

and voice our complaints there?
 
The group's conversations make for interesting reading - particularly the current thread of Expanding the Watering Hole.  Have no doubt - they are coming soon to a frequency we all love and use.  Time to make our voice heard!
 
Rick - N7WE
070 - #1602

 

 
 
 
 
 



--
WV3S
Monitoring 146.52 MHz & the CCARC UHF Repeater



Re: 17m PSK31

Peter Hiltz
 

All,

Having noticed the same thing on the bands I'd like to propose we shift down in frequency, as a group, and let our shift of numbers pull a new standard.  Folks will find us and move so as to make contacts.

We can approach this two ways:

a. I've noticed that most signals are not at the bandplan frequencies, but instead up 1.5 KHz.  That is, we're setting our radios to the bandplan frequency which, at least in fldigi, puts you up 1.5 KHz.  If we all subtract 1.5KHz we would be using the actual correct frequency, that is, centered at the bandplan frequency and ranging up or down a bit.

b. We agree as a group to shift down 2 KHz.  That will have the same effect with less confusion, assuming subtracting 1.5 KHz is confusing to some.

If we get the PODs folks to move, others will follow.  We can set a new standard ourselves, which might be easier than convincing the ARRL to update their bandplan.

I'm going to sit on 18.098 MHz on my dial, which puts fldigi looking at 18.0995 MHz.  It looks clear there, and around it.

Pete
WV3S

On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 1:16 PM, tom@... [070] <070@...> wrote:
 

As someone who does both, the FT8 default frequencies are programmed in WSJT-X application (which is still in the release candidate 2 stage for FT8).   The best chance is to get them to change the frequency they use on when the release version (or RC3) comes out by complaining on the group. 


This isn't the only band/mode that has a conflict, I don't FT8 also runs into Olivia on 20 meters.

If your hoping FT8 goes away, I seriously doubt it anytime soon.  It has absolutely dominated every other digital mode for use since it came out.   Even JT65/JT9 modes are pretty dead now, especially JT9.

73,

Tom KN6Q  

---In 070@..., wrote :

I know I am late to the party, but trying on 17m now.....

Fr Richard
WB8YXF


On Monday, October 9, 2017, 11:46:24 AM EDT, 'Steve Case' artcase@... [070] <070@...> wrote:


 

I was there too for the last half hour, CQ'd saw nothing but FT8 sigs. I agree use it or lose it.
Steve
WA7ETE
PNW
#872
 
 
 

From: "randy true w4rttrandy@... [070]" <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2017 8:41 AM
To: "070@..." <070@...>
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 

 

Nope, just 20 FT8 signals.

 

Randy W4RTT

 

From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of 'Mike Besemer' mwbesemer@... [070] <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 11:11 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: RE: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 

 

Not seeing you.  Can you see me?

 

Mike

WM4B

 

From: 070@... [mailto:070@...]
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 11:02 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31

 

 

I'm also there

 

Randy W4RTT

 


From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of 'Mike Besemer' mwbesemer@... [070] <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 10:57 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: RE: [070] 17m PSK31

 

 

CQing there now.  The FT8 stations moved away from where I’m at.

 

Mike

WM4B

 

From: 070@... [mailto:070@...]
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 10:48 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31

 

 

I just got into the digi modes a couple years ago, and I settled on PSK31 and have loved it. I did notice that whenever I went up to 17 and called there was seldom anyone around. I have made just a hand full of contacts on 17.

I do work FT8 and have mad many contacts on 17. But I try to keep above .100 because it is "our" freq. I think it was mostly, "hey these guys aren't using it, so lets us use it"

As the old saying says, if you don't use it you will lose it.

 

Randy W4RTT

 


From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of Jerry n9avy@... [070] <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 9:29 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31

 

 

Probably not, but "venting" feels good.     I am hesitant to join another group after cleaning out several groups people urged me to join.  There were days I'd wake up and have way too many emails to answer; so, I purged many email accounts that held little interest. Just don't want to start down that road again.

 

I'm hoping that once the FT8 people tire of the mode, they'll just go away.

 

Jerry  n9avy

 

 


From: "n7we1980@... [070]" <070@...>
To: 070@...
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 6:11 AM
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31

 

 

I too feel the frustration with FT-8 "taking over" what had been "our" segment of 17m.  But I doubt posting our concerns here will do much to change that.  May I suggest those of us who feel this is an inappropriate encroachment on the gentlemen's agreement join the WSJT Meteor Scatter and Weak Signal Group  

https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/wsjtgroup/info

and voice our complaints there?

 

The group's conversations make for interesting reading - particularly the current thread of Expanding the Watering Hole.  Have no doubt - they are coming soon to a frequency we all love and use.  Time to make our voice heard!

 

Rick - N7WE

070 - #1602

 

 

 

 

 

 




--
WV3S
Monitoring 146.52 MHz & the CCARC UHF Repeater


Re: 17m PSK31

tom@...
 

As someone who does both, the FT8 default frequencies are programmed in WSJT-X application (which is still in the release candidate 2 stage for FT8).   The best chance is to get them to change the frequency they use on when the release version (or RC3) comes out by complaining on the group. 

This isn't the only band/mode that has a conflict, I don't FT8 also runs into Olivia on 20 meters.

If your hoping FT8 goes away, I seriously doubt it anytime soon.  It has absolutely dominated every other digital mode for use since it came out.   Even JT65/JT9 modes are pretty dead now, especially JT9.

73,

Tom KN6Q  

---In 070@..., <rickocr2005@...> wrote :

I know I am late to the party, but trying on 17m now.....

Fr Richard
WB8YXF


On Monday, October 9, 2017, 11:46:24 AM EDT, 'Steve Case' artcase@... [070] <070@...> wrote:


 

I was there too for the last half hour, CQ'd saw nothing but FT8 sigs. I agree use it or lose it.
Steve
WA7ETE
PNW
#872
 
 
 

From: "randy true w4rttrandy@... [070]" <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2017 8:41 AM
To: "070@..." <070@...>
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 

 

Nope, just 20 FT8 signals.

 

Randy W4RTT

 

From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of 'Mike Besemer' mwbesemer@... [070] <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 11:11 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: RE: [070] 17m PSK31
 
 

 

Not seeing you.  Can you see me?

 

Mike

WM4B

 

From: 070@... [mailto:070@...]
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 11:02 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31

 

 

I'm also there

 

Randy W4RTT

 


From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of 'Mike Besemer' mwbesemer@... [070] <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 10:57 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: RE: [070] 17m PSK31

 

 

CQing there now.  The FT8 stations moved away from where I’m at.

 

Mike

WM4B

 

From: 070@... [mailto:070@...]
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 10:48 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31

 

 

I just got into the digi modes a couple years ago, and I settled on PSK31 and have loved it. I did notice that whenever I went up to 17 and called there was seldom anyone around. I have made just a hand full of contacts on 17.

I do work FT8 and have mad many contacts on 17. But I try to keep above .100 because it is "our" freq. I think it was mostly, "hey these guys aren't using it, so lets us use it"

As the old saying says, if you don't use it you will lose it.

 

Randy W4RTT

 


From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of Jerry n9avy@... [070] <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 9:29 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31

 

 

Probably not, but "venting" feels good.     I am hesitant to join another group after cleaning out several groups people urged me to join.  There were days I'd wake up and have way too many emails to answer; so, I purged many email accounts that held little interest. Just don't want to start down that road again.

 

I'm hoping that once the FT8 people tire of the mode, they'll just go away.

 

Jerry  n9avy

 

 


From: "n7we1980@... [070]" <070@...>
To: 070@...
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 6:11 AM
Subject: Re: [070] 17m PSK31

 

 

I too feel the frustration with FT-8 "taking over" what had been "our" segment of 17m.  But I doubt posting our concerns here will do much to change that.  May I suggest those of us who feel this is an inappropriate encroachment on the gentlemen's agreement join the WSJT Meteor Scatter and Weak Signal Group  

https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/wsjtgroup/info

and voice our complaints there?

 

The group's conversations make for interesting reading - particularly the current thread of Expanding the Watering Hole.  Have no doubt - they are coming soon to a frequency we all love and use.  Time to make our voice heard!

 

Rick - N7WE

070 - #1602

 

 

 

 

 

 


Re: 17M Now

Dan Morris - KZ3T
 

yep, no signals so I’ve moved to 10M but it is awful quiet also!!!  But calling

Dan Morris  KZ3T  070-1065

I live to live for Him!




On Oct 9, 2017, at 12:57 PM, Otets Richard rickocr2005@... [070] <070@...> wrote:


I am there calling CQ but don't see anyone else......

Fr Richard
WB8YXF



On Monday, October 9, 2017, 12:55:11 PM EDT, randy true w4rttrandy@... [070] <070@...> wrote:


 

Not seeing anything here.


Randy W4RTT




From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of Dan Morris dbmorris315@... [070] <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 12:50 PM
To: 070 List Service 070 List Service
Subject: Re: [070] 17M Now
 
 

I’m at 18.100 plus 800 and don’t see anything but calling also.


Dan Morris

I live to live for Him!




On Oct 9, 2017, at 12:48 PM, randy true w4rttrandy@... [070] <070@...> wrote:


I'm calling at 800 now.


Randy W4RTT



From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of Dan Morris dbmorris315@... [070] <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 12:44 PM
To: 070 List Service 070 List Service
Subject: [070] 17M Now
 
 

Calling CQ on 17M now at 1645Z

Dan Morris KZ3T 070-1065
dbmorris315@...

I live to live for Him!







Re: 17M Now

Dan Morris - KZ3T
 

Me either. Oh well.

Dan Morris

I live to live for Him!




On Oct 9, 2017, at 12:55 PM, randy true w4rttrandy@... [070] <070@...> wrote:


Not seeing anything here.


Randy W4RTT




From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of Dan Morris dbmorris315@... [070] <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 12:50 PM
To: 070 List Service 070 List Service
Subject: Re: [070] 17M Now
 
 

I’m at 18.100 plus 800 and don’t see anything but calling also.


Dan Morris

I live to live for Him!




On Oct 9, 2017, at 12:48 PM, randy true w4rttrandy@... [070] <070@...> wrote:


I'm calling at 800 now.


Randy W4RTT



From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of Dan Morris dbmorris315@... [070] <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 12:44 PM
To: 070 List Service 070 List Service
Subject: [070] 17M Now
 
 

Calling CQ on 17M now at 1645Z

Dan Morris KZ3T 070-1065
dbmorris315@...

I live to live for Him!







Re: 17M Now

Fr Richard R
 

I am there calling CQ but don't see anyone else......

Fr Richard
WB8YXF



On Monday, October 9, 2017, 12:55:11 PM EDT, randy true w4rttrandy@... [070] <070@...> wrote:


 

Not seeing anything here.


Randy W4RTT




From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of Dan Morris dbmorris315@... [070] <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 12:50 PM
To: 070 List Service 070 List Service
Subject: Re: [070] 17M Now
 
 

I’m at 18.100 plus 800 and don’t see anything but calling also.


Dan Morris

I live to live for Him!




On Oct 9, 2017, at 12:48 PM, randy true w4rttrandy@... [070] <070@...> wrote:


I'm calling at 800 now.


Randy W4RTT



From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of Dan Morris dbmorris315@... [070] <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 12:44 PM
To: 070 List Service 070 List Service
Subject: [070] 17M Now
 
 

Calling CQ on 17M now at 1645Z

Dan Morris KZ3T 070-1065
dbmorris315@...

I live to live for Him!




Re: 17M Now

Randy True
 

Not seeing anything here.


Randy W4RTT




From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of Dan Morris dbmorris315@... [070] <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 12:50 PM
To: 070 List Service 070 List Service
Subject: Re: [070] 17M Now
 
 

I’m at 18.100 plus 800 and don’t see anything but calling also.


Dan Morris

I live to live for Him!




On Oct 9, 2017, at 12:48 PM, randy true w4rttrandy@... [070] <070@...> wrote:


I'm calling at 800 now.


Randy W4RTT



From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of Dan Morris dbmorris315@... [070] <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 12:44 PM
To: 070 List Service 070 List Service
Subject: [070] 17M Now
 
 

Calling CQ on 17M now at 1645Z

Dan Morris KZ3T 070-1065
dbmorris315@...

I live to live for Him!




Re: 17M Now

Dan Morris - KZ3T
 

I’m at 18.100 plus 800 and don’t see anything but calling also.

Dan Morris

I live to live for Him!




On Oct 9, 2017, at 12:48 PM, randy true w4rttrandy@... [070] <070@...> wrote:


I'm calling at 800 now.


Randy W4RTT



From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of Dan Morris dbmorris315@... [070] <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 12:44 PM
To: 070 List Service 070 List Service
Subject: [070] 17M Now
 
 

Calling CQ on 17M now at 1645Z

Dan Morris KZ3T 070-1065
dbmorris315@...

I live to live for Him!




Re: 17M Now

Randy True
 

I'm calling at 800 now.


Randy W4RTT



From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of Dan Morris dbmorris315@... [070] <070@...>
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 12:44 PM
To: 070 List Service 070 List Service
Subject: [070] 17M Now
 
 

Calling CQ on 17M now at 1645Z

Dan Morris KZ3T 070-1065
dbmorris315@...

I live to live for Him!

12561 - 12580 of 65307