Re: 17 meters
Yep ! It will render most electronic devices useless for blocks ![]() Jerry n9avy
From: "mwbesemer@... [070]" <070@...> To: 070@... Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2017 9:35 AM Subject: Re: [070] 17 meters So, basically an all-mode, broadband kind of thing? No receiver necessary - just sniff out the Ozone. Mike WM4B On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Jerry n9avy@... [070] wrote: Next new mode will be "digital spark gap". *:)) laughing Jerry N9AVY ___________________________________ From: "Bill Garwood n4gbk@... [070]" <070@...> To: "070@..." <070@...> Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2017 7:32 AM Subject: [070] 17 meters Hi Folks, Several of you have been trying 17 meter PSK31 recently. If you are working on the 17 meter award (or any other award), it would help to know when to head to the shack and try to give you a contact. I'm always trying to help others get their needed QSOs for whatever award they are pursuing. I'm not really into stopping what I'm doing to head to the shack to chit chat. The problem with FT-8 "invading" your favor!
ite frequency is a lot bigger than FT-8, the ARRL or whatever. Back in the good ol' days, ham experimenters were designing and building equipment and antennas. Some of that is still happening but a lot of experimenters are working with ham radio digital software. I look at my DXKeeper log and it has a drop-down list of something like 30 digital modes to select. In the past couple of years, this list has expanded to include JT-65, JT-9 and FT-8 and probably some more. The issue of how and where to fit in all of these digital modes into the radio spectrum has not been resolved. I am sure there are developers out there somewhere working on something new right now that will eventually be added to the list of digital modes. Maybe the next improved PSK31 or FT-8 is just around the corner and will cause more clutter. I don't have the answer to the problem but I think it needs to come through the ITU as this is a global issue on the HF bands. Jamming other stations and causing intentional havoc on the bands because you do not like what is going on is not in the best interest of amateur radio. Thanks to everyone for the fun we have and I hope to see many of you on the waterfall soon. I've got my Pumpkin station ready for this weekend. Now if these pesky thunderstorms will just go away. 73, Bill N4GBK
|
|
Re: 365+1 back in action
David, K9DWR
* David Rock <david@graniteweb.com> [2017-10-11 10:09]:
Yay, I got one. Only 4 to go... -- David, K9DWR #1604 LONP #255 david@graniteweb.com
|
|
Re: 365+1 back in action
David, K9DWR
* n7we1980@gmail.com [070] <070@yahoogroups.com> [2017-10-11 11:36]:
David - Wondering if you got your Q last night. I'm tied up with dr. stuffRick, Nope. Trying on 20m this morning since I can actually see a couple traces now. -- David, K9DWR #1604 LONP #255 david@graniteweb.com
|
|
Re: 17 meters
Charles Odom <ki4vmk@...>
With JT65, JT9 and FT8 the trend is to make a contact and log it. No one wants to have interaction or conversation. Just sayin'
KI4VMK
On Oct 11, 2017, at 9:35 AM, "mwbesemer@... [070]" <070@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: 17 meters
mwbesemer@...
|
|
Re: 17 meters
Next new mode will be "digital spark gap". ![]() Jerry N9AVY
From: "Bill Garwood n4gbk@... [070]" <070@...> To: "070@..." <070@...> Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2017 7:32 AM Subject: [070] 17 meters Hi Folks,
Several of you have been trying 17 meter PSK31 recently. If you are working on the 17 meter award (or any other award), it would help to know when to head to the shack and try to give you a contact. I'm always trying to help others get their needed QSOs
for whatever award they are pursuing. I'm not really into stopping what I'm doing to head to the shack to chit chat.
The problem with FT-8 "invading" your favorite frequency is a lot bigger than FT-8, the ARRL or whatever. Back in the good ol' days, ham experimenters were designing and building equipment and antennas. Some of that is still happening but a lot of experimenters
are working with ham radio digital software. I look at my DXKeeper log and it has a drop-down list of something like 30 digital modes to select. In the past couple of years, this list has expanded to include JT-65, JT-9 and FT-8 and probably some more.
The issue of how and where to fit in all of these digital modes into the radio spectrum has not been resolved. I am sure there are developers out there somewhere working on something new right now that will eventually be added to the list of digital modes.
Maybe the next improved PSK31 or FT-8 is just around the corner and will cause more clutter. I don't have the answer to the problem but I think it needs to come through the ITU as this is a global issue on the HF bands. Jamming other stations and causing
intentional havoc on the bands because you do not like what is going on is not in the best interest of amateur radio.
Thanks to everyone for the fun we have and I hope to see many of you on the waterfall soon. I've got my Pumpkin station ready for this weekend. Now if these pesky thunderstorms will just go away.
73,
Bill N4GBK
|
|
17 meters
Bill Garwood
Hi Folks,
Several of you have been trying 17 meter PSK31 recently. If you are working on the 17 meter award (or any other award), it would help to know when to head to the shack and try to give you a contact. I'm always trying to help others get their needed QSOs for whatever award they are pursuing. I'm not really into stopping what I'm doing to head to the shack to chit chat.
The problem with FT-8 "invading" your favorite frequency is a lot bigger than FT-8, the ARRL or whatever. Back in the good ol' days, ham experimenters were designing and building equipment and antennas. Some of that is still happening but a lot of experimenters are working with ham radio digital software. I look at my DXKeeper log and it has a drop-down list of something like 30 digital modes to select. In the past couple of years, this list has expanded to include JT-65, JT-9 and FT-8 and probably some more. The issue of how and where to fit in all of these digital modes into the radio spectrum has not been resolved. I am sure there are developers out there somewhere working on something new right now that will eventually be added to the list of digital modes. Maybe the next improved PSK31 or FT-8 is just around the corner and will cause more clutter. I don't have the answer to the problem but I think it needs to come through the ITU as this is a global issue on the HF bands. Jamming other stations and causing intentional havoc on the bands because you do not like what is going on is not in the best interest of amateur radio.
Thanks to everyone for the fun we have and I hope to see many of you on the waterfall soon. I've got my Pumpkin station ready for this weekend. Now if these pesky thunderstorms will just go away.
73,
Bill N4GBK
|
|
Re: 070 Website
Jim,
Thanks, yes it came up about an 30 minutes ago
Bill – K3ABE
From: 070@... [mailto:070@...]
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2017 8:10 AM To: 070@... Subject: Re: [070] 070 Website
Bill, just tried it and it is working fine from here. On 10/11/2017 4:46 AM, 'Bill - K3ABE' bill@... [070] wrote:
|
|
Re: 070 Website
Bill, just tried it and it is working fine from here.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Jim, K5SP
On 10/11/2017 4:46 AM, 'Bill - K3ABE'
bill@... [070] wrote:
|
|
Re: 365+1 back in action
just let me know what time and I can be on there anytime today
except for around 230 - 400 CST.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Jim K5SP
On 10/11/2017 6:36 AM,
n7we1980@... [070] wrote:
|
|
Re: 365+1 back in action
David -
Wondering if you got your Q last night. I'm tied up with dr. stuff today until mid afternoon, but can be on air after that. 20m looks pretty good this morning. Seeing lots of Europe as the gray line gets here. Post if you still need a Q and where you will be and what time. I'll go searching for you! Rick - N7WE 070 - #1602
|
|
070 Website
Hello, trying to get into website and it is not working L
Bill – k3abe
|
|
Re: 365+1 back in action
David, K9DWR
* n7we1980@gmail.com [070] <070@yahoogroups.com> [2017-10-11 02:29]:
David- Not seeing you on 20m or 80m. Went back to 40m and nothing there. Earlier had you for a second (just your CQ) very light on 40m....but you couldn't copy me. Don't give up. Still lots of hours left in this day! 73,Yeah, I'll keep plugging away. worst case I'll try again in the morning Thanks for trying. -- David, K9DWR #1604 LONP #255 david@graniteweb.com
|
|
Re: 365+1 back in action
Rick, I am on 40 right now if we can make it and your still need..... Fr Richard WB8YXF
On Tuesday, October 10, 2017, 10:08:55 PM EDT, n7we1980@... [070] <070@...> wrote:
David- I'm on 40m and looking...but I don't see you. 0208 UTC. Rick - N7WE 070 - #1602
|
|
Re: 365+1 back in action
David-
Not seeing you on 20m or 80m. Went back to 40m and nothing there. Earlier had you for a second (just your CQ) very light on 40m....but you couldn't copy me. Don't give up. Still lots of hours left in this day! 73, Rick - N7WE 070 - #1602
|
|
Re: 365+1 back in action
David, K9DWR
* David Rock <david@graniteweb.com> [2017-10-10 21:19]:
* n7we1980@gmail.com [070] <070@yahoogroups.com> [2017-10-11 02:17]:Not seeing you on 20m. Can you try 80m?I'll try. My rig isn't very good on 80. Looks like it's going to be 40m or nothing. Matbe conditions will improve a little later. I'll keep calling on 7071 -- David, K9DWR #1604 LONP #255 david@graniteweb.com
|
|
Re: 365+1 back in action
David, K9DWR
* n7we1980@gmail.com [070] <070@yahoogroups.com> [2017-10-11 02:17]:
Not seeing you on 20m. Can you try 80m?I'll try. My rig isn't very good on 80. calling on 3581 -- David, K9DWR #1604 LONP #255 david@graniteweb.com
|
|
Re: 365+1 back in action
Not seeing you on 20m. Can you try 80m?
Rick - N7WE 070 - #1602
|
|
Re: 365+1 back in action
David, K9DWR
* n7we1980@gmail.com [070] <070@yahoogroups.com> [2017-10-11 02:08]:
David-Not having any luck. I can make out a trace, but no copy. Moving to 20m to see if that does any better -- David, K9DWR #1604 LONP #255 david@graniteweb.com
|
|
Re: 365+1 back in action
David-
I'm on 40m and looking...but I don't see you. 0208 UTC. Rick - N7WE 070 - #1602
|
|