|
Re: PSKfest comments
I followed the discussion on exchanges and found it useful. I
switched to fldigi and needed to set up macros.
I tried replying to CQ's with "n3jwj n3jwj" and got no response on at
least 6 attempts.
I followed the discussion on exchanges and found it useful. I
switched to fldigi and needed to set up macros.
I tried replying to CQ's with "n3jwj n3jwj" and got no response on at
least 6 attempts.
|
By
Darrell Frappier
·
#31186
·
|
|
Re: psk characters speed
Just re-read this and missed a comment.
PSK is not dependent on the speed of the CPU, as long as it is fast enough to run the software. The bit rate (for PSK31) is fixed at 31.25 bps regardless of
Just re-read this and missed a comment.
PSK is not dependent on the speed of the CPU, as long as it is fast enough to run the software. The bit rate (for PSK31) is fixed at 31.25 bps regardless of
|
By
Steve W3HF
·
#31185
·
|
|
Re: psk characters speed
Or just disconnect your computer from your radio, and let the computer free-wheel. Or just turn off the radio. No danger of transmitting then.
I've done both in the past to verify these
Or just disconnect your computer from your radio, and let the computer free-wheel. Or just turn off the radio. No danger of transmitting then.
I've done both in the past to verify these
|
By
Steve W3HF
·
#31184
·
|
|
Re: LONP checker errors
Mine.
By
Phil Barnett <philb@...>
·
#31183
·
|
|
Re: psk characters speed
If you transmit each into a dummy load and time the time your tx stays lit or needle deflects for each on a long string such as you show below, cant you verify the relative times with a simple
If you transmit each into a dummy load and time the time your tx stays lit or needle deflects for each on a long string such as you show below, cant you verify the relative times with a simple
|
By
Robert Johnstone
·
#31182
·
|
|
Re: LONP checker errors
Phil, which checker? Davids will do LONP also. The other one just does LONP (I think)
K7TRK
To: 070@...
Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 11:47 AM
Subject: [070] LONP checker errors
Hi
Phil, which checker? Davids will do LONP also. The other one just does LONP (I think)
K7TRK
To: 070@...
Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 11:47 AM
Subject: [070] LONP checker errors
Hi
|
By
pegduck56 <pegduck56@...>
·
#31181
·
|
|
LONP checker errors
Hi all.
I've been getting a lot of notifications of problems with the LONP
checker.
I believe this is an issue with the membership by number page and I have
notified the web site owner of the issue
Hi all.
I've been getting a lot of notifications of problems with the LONP
checker.
I believe this is an issue with the membership by number page and I have
notified the web site owner of the issue
|
By
Phil Barnett <philb@...>
·
#31180
·
|
|
Re: Answering CQs with Contest Exchanges (was PSKfest comments)
Hey Tim,
Tnx fer the Q!!!!
73
Joe
KA1PPV #1482
Hey Tim,
Tnx fer the Q!!!!
73
Joe
KA1PPV #1482
|
By
ljl2002@att.net
·
#31179
·
|
|
Welcome new members
Pse welcome new 070 Club members Larry WB5CXC #1616 and Dave KB8KOJ #1617...73 de Jay N3DQU
Pse welcome new 070 Club members Larry WB5CXC #1616 and Dave KB8KOJ #1617...73 de Jay N3DQU
|
By
J Budzowski <jbudzowski@...>
·
#31178
·
|
|
Re: psk characters speed
Craig has already mentioned some of what I would have said:
- Fewer people know the details of QPSK31, and the "default" is BPSK31.
- QPSK31 is inversion-dependent, like RTTY, so you have to match
Craig has already mentioned some of what I would have said:
- Fewer people know the details of QPSK31, and the "default" is BPSK31.
- QPSK31 is inversion-dependent, like RTTY, so you have to match
|
By
Steve W3HF
·
#31177
·
|
|
Re: software-using and logging
Hi- Mightt be age <G>,but did di that last year and it worked. So I printed it out and mailed it this am. Main log - n3fjp- In MMVARI, I record the contact ,as to having a ready check for dupes. If I
Hi- Mightt be age <G>,but did di that last year and it worked. So I printed it out and mailed it this am. Main log - n3fjp- In MMVARI, I record the contact ,as to having a ready check for dupes. If I
|
By
Doc
·
#31176
·
|
|
Re: software-using and logging
The scoring utility is looking for <DXCC> (the numeric code) and <STATE>
fields in order to robustly determine S/P/C for multipliers ...
What is your main logger? I recommend importing the contest
The scoring utility is looking for <DXCC> (the numeric code) and <STATE>
fields in order to robustly determine S/P/C for multipliers ...
What is your main logger? I recommend importing the contest
|
By
David Westbrook
·
#31175
·
|
|
Re: software-using and logging
Jerry, I use GenLog also.
After the contest, I click on "After Contest", then on the drop down menu "Log".
I click on "Write More Logs".
There I do a Dupe Sheet, and Summary. I save those to my
Jerry, I use GenLog also.
After the contest, I click on "After Contest", then on the drop down menu "Log".
I click on "Write More Logs".
There I do a Dupe Sheet, and Summary. I save those to my
|
By
N6MG - Milt.
·
#31174
·
|
|
software-using and logging
Hi-All- After a great contest,I need direction- Been using MMVARI for my contesting and logging to Gen log- been ok,but did an up-grade B4 the test. Couldn't seem to get a txt print-out that stated
Hi-All- After a great contest,I need direction- Been using MMVARI for my contesting and logging to Gen log- been ok,but did an up-grade B4 the test. Couldn't seem to get a txt print-out that stated
|
By
Doc
·
#31173
·
|
|
Re: psk characters speed
Some of it is due to no education about QPSK other reason could be due to hams resist change in general, it hard to know the difference by the sound and look (which I can hear the difference and see
Some of it is due to no education about QPSK other reason could be due to hams resist change in general, it hard to know the difference by the sound and look (which I can hear the difference and see
|
By
Craig AC4M
·
#31172
·
|
|
Re: psk characters speed
thanks steve!
If the rate is the same, and QPSK provides FEC (forward error correctrion)
for robust decodes, why isn't it used more?
Is is because of the latency? (from wiki) "To successfully
thanks steve!
If the rate is the same, and QPSK provides FEC (forward error correctrion)
for robust decodes, why isn't it used more?
Is is because of the latency? (from wiki) "To successfully
|
By
David Westbrook
·
#31171
·
|
|
Re: psk characters speed
I didn't check your lookup table, but the 00 delimiter and 32 ms per bit parameters are correct.
And FWIW, it's the same for QPSK31. Although QPSK encodes two bits per modulation symbol, the rate-1/2
I didn't check your lookup table, but the 00 delimiter and 32 ms per bit parameters are correct.
And FWIW, it's the same for QPSK31. Although QPSK encodes two bits per modulation symbol, the rate-1/2
|
By
Steve W3HF
·
#31170
·
|
|
psk characters speed
I have extended my "rtty length" calculator to do PSK31, too:
http://dwestbrook.net/projects/ham/rtty-length/?mode=PSK31
It will show the BPSK31 transmission time needed for any given string.
for
I have extended my "rtty length" calculator to do PSK31, too:
http://dwestbrook.net/projects/ham/rtty-length/?mode=PSK31
It will show the BPSK31 transmission time needed for any given string.
for
|
By
David Westbrook
·
#31169
·
|
|
Welcome new members
Pse welcome new 070 club members Terry K5TLJ #1612, Mike KB0YMO #1613, Terry W1EHQ #1614 and Clinton KF8MZ #1615...73 de Jay N3DQU
Pse welcome new 070 club members Terry K5TLJ #1612, Mike KB0YMO #1613, Terry W1EHQ #1614 and Clinton KF8MZ #1615...73 de Jay N3DQU
|
By
J Budzowski <jbudzowski@...>
·
#31168
·
|
|
3-30 PSK Ragchewers Award
goes to.. David � K9DWR
Name has submitted evidence of three 30 minutes (or more) QSOs for the 070 Club 3-30 PSK Ragchewers award.
Congratulations David�
73 de Ral - W1IPS
goes to.. David � K9DWR
Name has submitted evidence of three 30 minutes (or more) QSOs for the 070 Club 3-30 PSK Ragchewers award.
Congratulations David�
73 de Ral - W1IPS
|
By
Ral
·
#31167
·
|