The scoring utility is looking for <DXCC> (the numeric code) and <STATE> fields in order to robustly determine S/P/C for multipliers ... What is your main logger? I recommend importing the contest

Jerry, I use GenLog also. After the contest, I click on "After Contest", then on the drop down menu "Log". I click on "Write More Logs". There I do a Dupe Sheet, and Summary. I save those to my

Hi-All- After a great contest,I need direction- Been using MMVARI for my contesting and logging to Gen log- been ok,but did an up-grade B4 the test. Couldn't seem to get a txt print-out that stated

Some of it is due to no education about QPSK other reason could be due to hams resist change in general, it hard to know the difference by the sound and look (which I can hear the difference and see

thanks steve! If the rate is the same, and QPSK provides FEC (forward error correctrion) for robust decodes, why isn't it used more? Is is because of the latency? (from wiki) "To successfully

I didn't check your lookup table, but the 00 delimiter and 32 ms per bit parameters are correct. And FWIW, it's the same for QPSK31. Although QPSK encodes two bits per modulation symbol, the rate-1/2

I have extended my "rtty length" calculator to do PSK31, too: http://dwestbrook.net/projects/ham/rtty-length/?mode=PSK31 It will show the BPSK31 transmission time needed for any given string. for

Pse welcome new 070 club members Terry K5TLJ #1612, Mike KB0YMO #1613, Terry W1EHQ #1614 and Clinton KF8MZ #1615...73 de Jay N3DQU

goes to.. David � K9DWR Name has submitted evidence of three 30 minutes (or more) QSOs for the 070 Club 3-30 PSK Ragchewers award. Congratulations David� 73 de Ral - W1IPS

That's a great writeup! Looks like you climbed the learning curve exceedingly well, and you're right on with all of your points. Watch out -- contesting can be addictive! :) And it's also a

Greetings all, Paul, N1KRC, has submitted log evidence of 100 PSK31 QSOs with fellow PODXS Ø7Ø Club members and has been awarded LONP certificate #222 on this 6th day of January, 2013. Please

Yep- Why i don't do SSB much any more!! de W8KQ

Didn't we go through all this the last contest? Larry WA7HDZ #404 To: 070@... Sent: Saturday, January 5, 2013 5:37 PM Subject: RE: [070] Re: PSKfest comments Are you all serious about

Tim. I normally don't like contesting, so I am what one would call a casual contester. However, I tried to conform to what most people expect as far as the exchange and cadence, as well as something

Since I'm the one that asked the question about what the best macro setup is, it seems only fitting for me to weigh in on the subject. First of all, I'd like to say thank you for all the suggestions.

Unfortunately some of us no longer operate at warp speed or psk63 too well. kd0fip thanks everyone for the 38 contacts on 40m qrp.   In order to give away what it does not earn, Government must take

Tim, I had fun too.  I hope everyone did (despite the negative comments here).  You are correct - if it's no fun, no one will participate.  And if you hit a wrong macro, so what?  We all make

Tim, Thanks for the contacts! Milt. N6MG 070-650

Well, I am not going to get involved in the whole discussion of what is right and what is wrong. This is my very first contest in 38 years as a ham and I had a great time. I had some macros set up for

Well, it's written here: http://www.va7st.ca/home.html/2011/09/rtty-contesting-tips/  (and many other places a quick search will turn up, not just tips related to RTTY) I quote: "Some new