|
Re: Special Event the next two days... Buckingham Army Airfield
Hey John, Congrats on achieving LONP550 level with the >2786 submission. 73 Jim K5SP
On 3/24/2021 9:59 AM, John - KC3FL via
groups.io wrote:
--
Jim, K5SP #483 Executive Director/Member Services Director
|
|
|
|
Re: Special Event the next two days... Buckingham Army Airfield
Rick, |
|
|
|
Re: Special Event the next two days... Buckingham Army Airfield
Barry VA7GEM
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 07:14 AM, Rick - N7WE wrote:
I see other stations working Tom, and a bit of a trace when he replies. Not enough to decode however. I'm on a vertical and it has low angle reception so I guess I'm in the "cone of silence." Sorry Tom, I would have liked to work you! On the other hand, Italy and Poland are booming in. You don't always get what you want, and you don't always want what you get. So true when it comes to propagation!Rick I just want to add that sometimes you also get exactly what you expect. Waterfall is empty here. Not even showing the rain I can hear on the roof. cheers Barry
|
|
|
|
Re: Special Event the next two days... Buckingham Army Airfield
I see other stations working Tom, and a bit of a trace when he replies. Not enough to decode however. I'm on a vertical and it has low angle reception so I guess I'm in the "cone of silence." Sorry Tom, I would have liked to work you! On the other hand, Italy and Poland are booming in. You don't always get what you want, and you don't always want what you get. So true when it comes to propagation!
-- Rick - N7WE 070 - #1602
|
|
|
|
Re: Special Event the next two days... Buckingham Army Airfield
Don - KM4UDX
I am please to report that (a) I read the email in time to do something about it, (b) my radio was working, (c) I was working, (d) and I found Tom and we had a great QSO.
What a thrill to talk to Buckingham Airfield. Thank you Tom very much for setting the special event station up. You made my day, and that was before I had my coffee. Oh, Tom mentioned that I was the second uBITX radio type to contact him, so the Team uBITX is out and about, I'm pleased to report. Go 10 watts go! hahah. Also, I got some screen gabs of w4lx on the water fall. I have no way to reduce RF gain, beyond turning down the volume (yea, a simple radio!). But this was a hot signal into Northern Virginia.    -- Don, km4udx, uBITX
|
|
|
|
Re: Special Event the next two days... Buckingham Army Airfield
Tom
I should start about 9 AM Eastern.
Tom – KM4LPW
From: main@070Club.groups.io <main@070Club.groups.io> On Behalf Of Jim K5SP
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 7:28 PM To: main@070Club.groups.io Subject: Re: [070Club] Special Event the next two days... Buckingham Army Airfield
Saw you on this afternoon, guess you could not copy me. Maybe tomorrow. 73 Jim K5SP On 3/23/2021 5:11 PM, Tom wrote:
|
|
|
|
Re: Special Event the next two days... Buckingham Army Airfield
Saw you on this afternoon, guess you could not copy me. Maybe tomorrow. 73 Jim K5SP
On 3/23/2021 5:11 PM, Tom wrote:
--
Jim, K5SP #483 Executive Director/Member Services Director
|
|
|
|
Re: Special Event the next two days... Buckingham Army Airfield
Tom
Hello “Group,”
I will be on 20 and possibly 40, for the next two mid-days as W4LX, to participate in the Buckingham Airfield Special Event.
Approximately 50,000 bomber gunners were trained at Buckingham Army Airfield during WW2. They flew mostly in B-17 Flying Fortresses and B-24 Liberators.
Please drop by and visit when you see me on the waterfall in PSK-31. Thanks. There is a Certificate available for a completed QSO.
Blessings and 73s,
Tom – KM4LPW PODXS 070 #2826 Check it out: Buckingham Army Airfield Special Event | FMARC
|
|
|
|
Re: LONP Submittals Anyone?
Hope all 93 contacts will count. Jerry
On Tuesday, March 23, 2021, 04:17:00 PM CDT, Randy True <w4rttrandy@...> wrote:
Jerry, does that mean you don't want your 91 contacts counted 😁
Randy W4RTT😁 From: main@070Club.groups.io <main@070Club.groups.io> on behalf of N6MG - Milt. via groups.io <n6mg@...>
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2021 11:59 PM To: main@070Club.groups.io <main@070Club.groups.io> Subject: Re: [070Club] LONP Submittals Anyone? LotW and eQSL have absolutely nothing to do with LONP and submitting logs to our awards checker.
That would be a different subject.
I was simply reminding guys that, "I'm just trying to drum up some business for
the verification of contacts you may have with 070'rs with higher than 070-2787 as their quite unique, only place in the world of Amateur Radio, membership identifiers!"
Whew!...Glad ur not worried about winning anything!
It was a good contest/operating event.
Milt.
N6MG
-----Original Message-----
From: Jerry N9AVY <n9avy@...> To: main@070Club.groups.io <main@070Club.groups.io> Sent: Mon, Mar 22, 2021 5:31 pm Subject: Re: [070Club] LONP Submittals Anyone? Milt:
Many of the newer members I worked in St. Pat's test have already QSLed either via LoTW or Eqsl. Some of the older members I had not worked also QSLed. Adding new numbers was my main goal in the test. Think I worked about 16 members after
2787 in past couple months.
I just had a lot of fun in contest. Not worried about winning anything.
Jerry
On Monday, March 22, 2021, 07:24:29 PM CDT, N6MG - Milt. via groups.io <n6mg@...> wrote:
St Paddy's is now in the books. Can we all, who are interested, please upload their logs to the Award Checker"?
Link --> Link to Award Checker (hamclubs.info) I'm just trying to drum up some business for the verification of contacts you may have with 070'rs with higher than 070-2787 as their quite unique, only place in the world of Amateur Radio, membership identifiers! That's it's currently 5:25 pm here in Southern California. Hi-ball time. Milt. N6MG 070-650 LONP #76 W6QP - Trustee/Owner
|
|
|
|
Re: LONP Submittals Anyone?
Jerry, does that mean you don't want your 91 contacts counted 😁
Randy W4RTT😁
From: main@070Club.groups.io <main@070Club.groups.io> on behalf of N6MG - Milt. via groups.io <n6mg@...>
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2021 11:59 PM To: main@070Club.groups.io <main@070Club.groups.io> Subject: Re: [070Club] LONP Submittals Anyone? LotW and eQSL have absolutely nothing to do with LONP and submitting logs to our awards checker.
That would be a different subject.
I was simply reminding guys that, "I'm just trying to drum up some business for
the verification of contacts you may have with 070'rs with higher than 070-2787 as their quite unique, only place in the world of Amateur Radio, membership identifiers!"
Whew!...Glad ur not worried about winning anything!
It was a good contest/operating event.
Milt.
N6MG
-----Original Message-----
From: Jerry N9AVY <n9avy@...> To: main@070Club.groups.io <main@070Club.groups.io> Sent: Mon, Mar 22, 2021 5:31 pm Subject: Re: [070Club] LONP Submittals Anyone? Milt:
Many of the newer members I worked in St. Pat's test have already QSLed either via LoTW or Eqsl. Some of the older members I had not worked also QSLed. Adding new numbers was my main goal in the test. Think I worked about 16 members after
2787 in past couple months.
I just had a lot of fun in contest. Not worried about winning anything.
Jerry
On Monday, March 22, 2021, 07:24:29 PM CDT, N6MG - Milt. via groups.io <n6mg@...> wrote:
St Paddy's is now in the books. Can we all, who are interested, please upload their logs to the Award Checker"?
Link --> Link to Award Checker (hamclubs.info) I'm just trying to drum up some business for the verification of contacts you may have with 070'rs with higher than 070-2787 as their quite unique, only place in the world of Amateur Radio, membership identifiers! That's it's currently 5:25 pm here in Southern California. Hi-ball time. Milt. N6MG 070-650 LONP #76 W6QP - Trustee/Owner
|
|
|
|
Re: LONP Submittals Anyone?
LotW and eQSL have absolutely nothing to do with LONP and submitting logs to our awards checker.
That would be a different subject.
I was simply reminding guys that, "I'm just trying to drum up some business for the verification of contacts you may have with 070'rs with higher than 070-2787 as their quite unique, only place in the world of Amateur Radio, membership identifiers!"
Whew!...Glad ur not worried about winning anything!
It was a good contest/operating event.
Milt.
N6MG
-----Original Message-----
From: Jerry N9AVY <n9avy@...> To: main@070Club.groups.io <main@070Club.groups.io> Sent: Mon, Mar 22, 2021 5:31 pm Subject: Re: [070Club] LONP Submittals Anyone? Milt:
Many of the newer members I worked in St. Pat's test have already QSLed either via LoTW or Eqsl. Some of the older members I had not worked also QSLed. Adding new numbers was my main goal in the test. Think I worked about 16 members after 2787 in past couple months.
I just had a lot of fun in contest. Not worried about winning anything.
Jerry
On Monday, March 22, 2021, 07:24:29 PM CDT, N6MG - Milt. via groups.io <n6mg@...> wrote:
St Paddy's is now in the books. Can we all, who are interested, please upload their logs to the Award Checker"?
Link --> Link to Award Checker (hamclubs.info) I'm just trying to drum up some business for the verification of contacts you may have with 070'rs with higher than 070-2787 as their quite unique, only place in the world of Amateur Radio, membership identifiers! That's it's currently 5:25 pm here in Southern California. Hi-ball time. Milt. N6MG 070-650 LONP #76 W6QP - Trustee/Owner
|
|
|
|
Re: KC9UR POTA Activation Today
Bob Motyl KK6KMU
Bob,
Thanks for your input. I plan to use SSB and PSK. Im going to try and get out next week. Bob KK6KMU
|
|
|
|
Re: LONP Submittals Anyone?
Milt: Many of the newer members I worked in St. Pat's test have already QSLed either via LoTW or Eqsl. Some of the older members I had not worked also QSLed. Adding new numbers was my main goal in the test. Think I worked about 16 members after 2787 in past couple months. I just had a lot of fun in contest. Not worried about winning anything. Jerry
On Monday, March 22, 2021, 07:24:29 PM CDT, N6MG - Milt. via groups.io <n6mg@...> wrote:
St Paddy's is now in the books. Can we all, who are interested, please upload their logs to the Award Checker"? Link --> Link to Award Checker (hamclubs.info) I'm just trying to drum up some business for the verification of contacts you may have with 070'rs with higher than 070-2787 as their quite unique, only place in the world of Amateur Radio, membership identifiers! That's it's currently 5:25 pm here in Southern California. Hi-ball time. Milt. N6MG 070-650 LONP #76 W6QP - Trustee/Owner
|
|
|
|
LONP Submittals Anyone?
St Paddy's is now in the books. Can we all, who are interested, please upload their logs to the Award Checker"?
Link --> Link to Award Checker (hamclubs.info) I'm just trying to drum up some business for the verification of contacts you may have with 070'rs with higher than 070-2787 as their quite unique, only place in the world of Amateur Radio, membership identifiers! That's it's currently 5:25 pm here in Southern California. Hi-ball time. Milt. N6MG 070-650 LONP #76 W6QP - Trustee/Owner
|
|
|
|
Re: St. Pat's Log
That was the problem.
Randy W4RTT
From: main@070Club.groups.io <main@070Club.groups.io> on behalf of David, K9DWR <david@...>
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2021 7:18 PM To: main@070Club.groups.io <main@070Club.groups.io> Subject: Re: [070Club] St. Pat's Log * Randy True <w4rttrandy@...> [2021-03-22 16:51]:
> Tried again today, same results. Help. Randy, I think your entries for WS0Y are breaking things. It looks like the zero is not a simple 0, but probably the goofy "slashed 0" character. That's not valid because it's not a digit, so things are barfing. Can you check and see if you can fix those in you file and upload again? -- David, K9DWR #1604 LONP #255 david@...
|
|
|
|
Re: St. Pat's Log
Jerry...
I'm not the high sheriff of the logs. Look at your score, and the list of Q's. You can copy/paste and print it to eyeball perouse it. You have "filename.adif" . That's your file name. You can call it whatever you want.
When you download it from your logging software as an ".adi" file, that's when it's signed .adi.
If you didn't add the ".adif", then your logging software did it. There's your out..., but again, it just doesn't matter.
n6mg
-----Original Message-----
From: Jerry N9AVY <n9avy@...> To: main@070Club.groups.io <main@070Club.groups.io> Sent: Mon, Mar 22, 2021 4:27 pm Subject: Re: [070Club] St. Pat's Log David:
I was seing "filename.adif.adi" which looked strange to me .
If you say it's okay then I'm okay with that.
Thanks.
Jerry
On Monday, March 22, 2021, 05:55:53 PM CDT, David, K9DWR <david@...> wrote:
* David Rock <david@...> [2021-03-22 17:44]:
> * Jerry N9AVY <n9avy@...> [2021-03-21 16:33]: > > Just uploaded my log, but something didn't look right. At end of file it showeed A"adif.adi" that seemed wrong. > > David is it right ?? > > I'll take a look. Mike and Jerry's look ok to me, Randy's does not. I'll have to dig a little to see what's going on. Mike and Jerry; what, exactly, are you seeing? When I check yours, it looks fine. Note that you can always review your latest contest results by just changing the call value in the URL: https://www.podxs070.com/checker/upload_results.php?call=n9avy https://www.podxs070.com/checker/upload_results.php?call=VE3LTN -- David, K9DWR #1604 LONP #255 david@...
|
|
|
|
Re: ADIF
Milt: File was named "xxxxx.adif" when I sent it, but it came back as "xxxxx.adif.adi" which looked weird/funny/strange. Jerry
On Monday, March 22, 2021, 06:23:45 PM CDT, N6MG - Milt. via groups.io <n6mg@...> wrote:
Jerry...
Steve, you are correct.
I think what's confusing Jerry is that the entire file name is EX: "xxxx.adi"
When he submits it, he's submitting "xxx.adi.adi"
Maybe that's what you're seeing Jerry.
Rename the file, but regardless, the score wont get bigger...Hi Hi
It'll stay the same, because it IS the same file.
Milt.
N6MG
-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Melachrinos via groups.io <melachri@...> To: main@070Club.groups.io <main@070Club.groups.io> Sent: Mon, Mar 22, 2021 3:11 pm Subject: Re: [070Club] ADIF I don't think it matters.
As long as the file is properly formatted ADIF, I really think the extension can be anything.
Steve
W3HF
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim K5SP <jinnis@...> To: main@070Club.groups.io Sent: Mon, Mar 22, 2021 1:59 pm Subject: Re: [070Club] ADIF .adif
On Mar 22, 2021 12:16 PM, gillette789@... wrote:
What is the correct file extension for awards ? -- Jim, K5SP #483 Executive Director/Member Services Director
|
|
|
|
Re: St. Pat's Log
David: I was seing "filename.adif.adi" which looked strange to me . If you say it's okay then I'm okay with that. Thanks. Jerry
On Monday, March 22, 2021, 05:55:53 PM CDT, David, K9DWR <david@...> wrote:
* David Rock <david@...> [2021-03-22 17:44]: > * Jerry N9AVY <n9avy@...> [2021-03-21 16:33]: > > Just uploaded my log, but something didn't look right. At end of file it showeed A"adif.adi" that seemed wrong. > > David is it right ?? > > I'll take a look. Mike and Jerry's look ok to me, Randy's does not. I'll have to dig a little to see what's going on. Mike and Jerry; what, exactly, are you seeing? When I check yours, it looks fine. Note that you can always review your latest contest results by just changing the call value in the URL: https://www.podxs070.com/checker/upload_results.php?call=n9avy https://www.podxs070.com/checker/upload_results.php?call=VE3LTN -- David, K9DWR #1604 LONP #255 david@...
|
|
|
|
Re: ADIF
Jerry...
Steve, you are correct.
I think what's confusing Jerry is that the entire file name is EX: "xxxx.adi"
When he submits it, he's submitting "xxx.adi.adi"
Maybe that's what you're seeing Jerry.
Rename the file, but regardless, the score wont get bigger...Hi Hi
It'll stay the same, because it IS the same file.
Milt.
N6MG
-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Melachrinos via groups.io <melachri@...> To: main@070Club.groups.io <main@070Club.groups.io> Sent: Mon, Mar 22, 2021 3:11 pm Subject: Re: [070Club] ADIF I don't think it matters.
As long as the file is properly formatted ADIF, I really think the extension can be anything.
Steve
W3HF
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim K5SP <jinnis@...> To: main@070Club.groups.io Sent: Mon, Mar 22, 2021 1:59 pm Subject: Re: [070Club] ADIF .adif
On Mar 22, 2021 12:16 PM, gillette789@... wrote:
What is the correct file extension for awards ? -- Jim, K5SP #483 Executive Director/Member Services Director
|
|
|
|
Re: St. Pat's Log
David, K9DWR
* Randy True <w4rttrandy@outlook.com> [2021-03-22 16:51]:
Tried again today, same results. Help.Randy, I think your entries for WS0Y are breaking things. It looks like the zero is not a simple 0, but probably the goofy "slashed 0" character. That's not valid because it's not a digit, so things are barfing. Can you check and see if you can fix those in you file and upload again? -- David, K9DWR #1604 LONP #255 david@graniteweb.com
|
|
|