|
Re: Explain Something for Me
Sounds like Mavis might have been a ham ! 
From: "boat.anchor@... [070]" <070@...> To: 070@... Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 6:00 PM Subject: Re: [070] Explain Something for Me Joe Was her name Mavis Bacon?She taught in a lot of schools. Barry ---In 070@..., wrote : This is the reason that I never sign as /QRP because I heard that it screws up some logging programs. Besides the other Ham is usually surprised to see the power levels when they get the card.. I found it a good practice to watch what I am sending out to catch anything that may not be right so that I can correct it on the next. (I'm not the greatest typist on the planet.) Should have taken typing in HS when I had the chance. The teacher was great and the class was all girls. What an idiot! Joe KA1PPV #1482
|
|
|
|
Re: Explain Something for Me
boat.anchor@...
Joe
Was her name Mavis Bacon?She taught in a lot of schools. Barry ---In 070@..., <joe_molon@...> wrote : This is the reason that I never sign as /QRP because I heard that it screws up some logging programs. Besides the other Ham is usually surprised to see the power levels when they get the card.. I found it a good practice to watch what I am sending out to catch anything that may not be right so that I can correct it on the next. (I'm not the greatest typist on the planet.) Should have taken typing in HS when I had the chance. The teacher was great and the class was all girls. What an idiot! Joe KA1PPV #1482
|
|
|
|
Re: Weird Eqsl stuff
boat.anchor@...
I suspect this happens when someone uploads their entire log on the off chance they might have missed one QSO. Barry ---In 070@..., <n4gbk@...> wrote : Yep, same here…took me a while to mark as duplicates in eQSL. I do not send replies to the other station, just mark them as duplicates and delete.
Bill N4GBK
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Jerry n9avy@... [070]
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 10:12 AM To: 070 List Service 070 List Service Subject: [070] Weird Eqsl stuff
I never initiate Eqsls, but only confirm what is sent me.
Wonder if Eqsl is having problems ? Anyone see this ?
Jerry n9avy
|
|
|
|
Re: Explain Something for Me
boat.anchor@...
Bill
QRZ QRZ about 3 times usually fixes this or just request longcall. Then he has to type it. Barry ---In 070@..., <n4gbk@...> wrote : SNIP Then there are others who send their call as <N4GBK> in brackets. My software does not recognize that as a call sign so I have to cut and paste it or type it in to make a QSO with that station. Why do some stations send their call in brackets? Happy Radio! 73, Bill #1688 SNIP
|
|
|
|
Re: first namer
RRR Charlie you are 111111 .... solid cpy om
From: "'Mike Besemer' mwbesemer@... [070]" <070@...> To: 070@... Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 5:32 PM Subject: RE: [070] first namer RRR Jerry… FB es copy all. Ur RSQ is 599999. 100% copy, but please repeat your callsign and QTH.
de WM4B Mike (Not Michael or Charlie) #348 From: 070@... [mailto:070@...] Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 6:10 PM To: 070@... Subject: Re: [070] first namer Looks like he fixed some of it, but now has RSQ with 6 digits and INFO: ,my clubs > . Give him a break because it looks like he's working on fixing stuff . Jerry n9avy ________________________________________ From: "'ljl2002@...' joe_molon@... [070]" <070@...> To: "070@..." <070@...> Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 9:18 AM Subject: Re: [070] first namer Hey Randy, Is he the same guy that runs the station??? Joe KA1PPV #1482 On Sunday, July 16, 2017 11:36 PM, "Jerry n9avy@... [070]" <070@...> wrote: I agree. ________________________________________ From: "'Justin Mattes-KC2GIK' kc2gik@... [070]" <070@...> To: 070@... Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2017 10:32 PM Subject: Re: [070] first namer I have been following this thread from the beginning and still have no idea why it's cntinuing on for so long. Especially since the ham can't read it. Maybe people should be forwarding these messages to him so he sees the error of his ways. Seriously whenever I read about a wrong doing over the air by a non-member on this list, I think to myself time might be better spent dropping the offending operate a polite email explaining to him how to become a better opeator Justin KC2GIK > Only 23 lookups on QRZ. Must be a new Ham. > > > Randy W4RTT > > > ________________________________ > From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of randy true > w4rttrandy@... [070] <070@...> > Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2017 10:42 PM > To: 070@... > Subject: Re: [070] first namer > > > > Yeah, he's around 7.070.7 > > > Randy W4RTT > > > ________________________________ > From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of Jon Greene - > wx5nco wx5nco@... [070] <070@...> > Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2017 10:41 PM > To: randy true w4rttrandy@... [070] > Subject: Re: [070] first namer > > > > You mean the > > BTU Your Call de XX#XXX kn ?? > > I noticed he said he is running between 20 and 100 watts???? > > 73 > Jon Greene WX5NCO > Tulsa, Oklahoma EM26 > 070 - 592 > 30DMC - 1233 > DMC - 741 > EPC - 5134 > 1010 - 74420 > > > > > > On Sunday, July 16, 2017, 9:38:30 PM CDT, randy true > w4rttrandy@... [070] <070@...> wrote: > > > > > Uh oh, looks like the dude with the "first name" macro is back on. > > > Randy W4RTT > > > >
|
|
|
|
Re: first namer
"599322" ????
From: "'ljl2002@...' joe_molon@... [070]" <070@...> To: "070@..." <070@...> Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 5:24 PM Subject: Re: [070] first namer He probably didn't put a space between 599 and 599. I've been guilty of doing that too. You know how it is with keyboards....stuff happens. Steve said at one time that qrm and qsb can change things for you. We are only working with 1's and zero's here and everyone knows computers are always mistake proof. I'll go back to the shack and tune my wooden receiver now. Joe KA1PPV #1482 On Monday, July 17, 2017 6:10 PM, "Jerry n9avy@... [070]" <070@...> wrote: Looks like he fixed some of it, but now has RSQ with 6 digits and INFO: ,my clubs > . Give him a break because it looks like he's working on fixing stuff . Jerry n9avy From: "'ljl2002@...' joe_molon@... [070]" <070@...> To: "070@..." <070@...> Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 9:18 AM Subject: Re: [070] first namer Hey Randy, Is he the same guy that runs the station??? Joe KA1PPV #1482 On Sunday, July 16, 2017 11:36 PM, "Jerry n9avy@... [070]" <070@...> wrote: I agree. From: "'Justin Mattes-KC2GIK' kc2gik@... [070]" <070@...> To: 070@... Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2017 10:32 PM Subject: Re: [070] first namer I have been following this thread from the beginning and still have no
idea why it's cntinuing on for so long. Especially since the ham can't read it. Maybe people should be forwarding these messages to him so he sees the error of his ways. Seriously whenever I read about a wrong doing over the air by a non-member on this list, I think to myself time might be better spent dropping the offending operate a polite email explaining to him how to become a better opeator Justin KC2GIK > Only 23 lookups on QRZ. Must be a new Ham. > > > Randy W4RTT > > > ________________________________ > From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of randy true > w4rttrandy@... [070] <070@...> > Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2017 10:42 PM > To: 070@... > Subject: Re: [070] first namer > > > > Yeah, he's around 7.070.7 > > > Randy W4RTT > > > ________________________________ > From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of Jon Greene - > wx5nco wx5nco@... [070] <070@...> > Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2017 10:41 PM > To: randy true w4rttrandy@... [070] > Subject: Re: [070] first namer > > > > You mean the > > BTU Your Call de XX#XXX kn ?? > > I noticed he said he is running between 20 and 100 watts???? > > 73 > Jon Greene WX5NCO > Tulsa, Oklahoma EM26 > 070 - 592 > 30DMC - 1233 > DMC - 741 > EPC - 5134 > 1010 - 74420 > > > > > > On Sunday, July 16, 2017, 9:38:30 PM CDT, randy true > w4rttrandy@... [070] <070@...> wrote: > > > > > Uh oh, looks like the dude with the "first name" macro is back on. > > > Randy W4RTT > > > >
|
|
|
|
Re: first namer
ljl2002@att.net
He probably didn't put a space between 599 and 599. I've been guilty of doing that too. You know how it is with keyboards....stuff happens. Steve said at one time that qrm and qsb can change things for you. We are only working with 1's and zero's here and everyone knows computers are always mistake proof. I'll go back to the shack and tune my wooden receiver now. Joe KA1PPV #1482
On Monday, July 17, 2017 6:10 PM, "Jerry n9avy@... [070]" <070@...> wrote: Looks like he fixed some of it, but now has RSQ with 6 digits and INFO: ,my clubs > . Give him a break because it looks like he's working on fixing stuff . Jerry n9avy From: "'ljl2002@...' joe_molon@... [070]" <070@...> To: "070@..." <070@...> Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 9:18 AM Subject: Re: [070] first namer Hey Randy, Is he the same guy that runs the station??? Joe KA1PPV #1482 On Sunday, July 16, 2017 11:36 PM, "Jerry n9avy@... [070]" <070@...> wrote: I agree. From: "'Justin Mattes-KC2GIK' kc2gik@... [070]" <070@...> To: 070@... Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2017 10:32 PM Subject: Re: [070] first namer I have been following this thread from the beginning and still have no
idea why it's cntinuing on for so long. Especially since the ham can't read it. Maybe people should be forwarding these messages to him so he sees the error of his ways. Seriously whenever I read about a wrong doing over the air by a non-member on this list, I think to myself time might be better spent dropping the offending operate a polite email explaining to him how to become a better opeator Justin KC2GIK > Only 23 lookups on QRZ. Must be a new Ham. > > > Randy W4RTT > > > ________________________________ > From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of randy true > w4rttrandy@... [070] <070@...> > Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2017 10:42 PM > To: 070@... > Subject: Re: [070] first namer > > > > Yeah, he's around 7.070.7 > > > Randy W4RTT > > > ________________________________ > From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of Jon Greene - > wx5nco wx5nco@... [070] <070@...> > Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2017 10:41 PM > To: randy true w4rttrandy@... [070] > Subject: Re: [070] first namer > > > > You mean the > > BTU Your Call de XX#XXX kn ?? > > I noticed he said he is running between 20 and 100 watts???? > > 73 > Jon Greene WX5NCO > Tulsa, Oklahoma EM26 > 070 - 592 > 30DMC - 1233 > DMC - 741 > EPC - 5134 > 1010 - 74420 > > > > > > On Sunday, July 16, 2017, 9:38:30 PM CDT, randy true > w4rttrandy@... [070] <070@...> wrote: > > > > > Uh oh, looks like the dude with the "first name" macro is back on. > > > Randy W4RTT > > > >
|
|
|
|
Re: first namer
Mike Besemer <mwbesemer@...>
RRR Jerry… FB es copy all. Ur RSQ is 599999. 100% copy, but please repeat your callsign and QTH.
de WM4B Mike (Not Michael or Charlie) #348 From: 070@yahoogroups.com [mailto:070@yahoogroups.com] Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 6:10 PM To: 070@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [070] first namer Looks like he fixed some of it, but now has RSQ with 6 digits and INFO: ,my clubs > . Give him a break because it looks like he's working on fixing stuff . Jerry n9avy ________________________________________ From: "'ljl2002@att.net' joe_molon@yahoo.com [070]" <070@yahoogroups.com> To: "070@yahoogroups.com" <070@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 9:18 AM Subject: Re: [070] first namer Hey Randy, Is he the same guy that runs the <his call> station??? Joe KA1PPV #1482 On Sunday, July 16, 2017 11:36 PM, "Jerry n9avy@sbcglobal.net [070]" <070@yahoogroups.com> wrote: I agree. ________________________________________ From: "'Justin Mattes-KC2GIK' kc2gik@justinmattes.com [070]" <070@yahoogroups.com> To: 070@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2017 10:32 PM Subject: Re: [070] first namer I have been following this thread from the beginning and still have no idea why it's cntinuing on for so long. Especially since the ham can't read it. Maybe people should be forwarding these messages to him so he sees the error of his ways. Seriously whenever I read about a wrong doing over the air by a non-member on this list, I think to myself time might be better spent dropping the offending operate a polite email explaining to him how to become a better opeator Justin KC2GIK Only 23 lookups on QRZ. Must be a new Ham.
|
|
|
|
Re: OO Report
ljl2002@att.net
Jerry, That explains why you got a good report from him. Joe KA1PPV #1482
On Monday, July 17, 2017 4:09 PM, "Paula Johnson hamette@... [070]" <070@...> wrote: I got one several months ago, it might be from the same guy. I was really tickled! Paula K7PAX Wow ! Today I received an OO Good Operator Report in mail from an OO in CA. Blocked out his signature/call on purpose. As an OO , I find this really an honor; especially since some 2-lander was complaining about my signal last week ! Jerry N9AVY #454
|
|
|
|
Re: first namer
Looks like he fixed some of it, but now has RSQ with 6 digits and INFO: ,my clubs > . Give him a break because it looks like he's working on fixing stuff . Jerry n9avy
From: "'ljl2002@...' joe_molon@... [070]" <070@...> To: "070@..." <070@...> Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 9:18 AM Subject: Re: [070] first namer Hey Randy, Is he the same guy that runs the Joe KA1PPV #1482 On Sunday, July 16, 2017 11:36 PM, "Jerry n9avy@... [070]" <070@...> wrote: I agree. From: "'Justin Mattes-KC2GIK' kc2gik@... [070]" <070@...> To: 070@... Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2017 10:32 PM Subject: Re: [070] first namer I have been following this thread from the beginning and still have no
idea why it's cntinuing on for so long. Especially since the ham can't read it. Maybe people should be forwarding these messages to him so he sees the error of his ways. Seriously whenever I read about a wrong doing over the air by a non-member on this list, I think to myself time might be better spent dropping the offending operate a polite email explaining to him how to become a better opeator Justin KC2GIK > Only 23 lookups on QRZ. Must be a new Ham. > > > Randy W4RTT > > > ________________________________ > From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of randy true > w4rttrandy@... [070] <070@...> > Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2017 10:42 PM > To: 070@... > Subject: Re: [070] first namer > > > > Yeah, he's around 7.070.7 > > > Randy W4RTT > > > ________________________________ > From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of Jon Greene - > wx5nco wx5nco@... [070] <070@...> > Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2017 10:41 PM > To: randy true w4rttrandy@... [070] > Subject: Re: [070] first namer > > > > You mean the > > BTU Your Call de XX#XXX kn ?? > > I noticed he said he is running between 20 and 100 watts???? > > 73 > Jon Greene WX5NCO > Tulsa, Oklahoma EM26 > 070 - 592 > 30DMC - 1233 > DMC - 741 > EPC - 5134 > 1010 - 74420 > > > > > > On Sunday, July 16, 2017, 9:38:30 PM CDT, randy true > w4rttrandy@... [070] <070@...> wrote: > > > > > Uh oh, looks like the dude with the "first name" macro is back on. > > > Randy W4RTT > > > >
|
|
|
|
Re: Utah Grid Needs
Paul <nu4c@...>
Bryan I need most Utah grids. Please post you gridpedxtion plans here a day or so before you go. 73 Paul nu4c #824 Sent from my Galaxy Tab® A
-------- Original message -------- From: "Bryon nnegrom@... [070]" <070@...> Date: 7/17/17 14:37 (GMT-05:00) To: 070@... Subject: [070] Re: Utah Grid Needs Yes, I added that. It is North of Moab on the way to Grand Junction Colorado. It would be a small detour on the Moab (DM58).
I see others are adding them as well. That is great. I'll need to do a test mobile setup and then go grab them from time to time. Thanks Bryon, W7RIV
|
|
|
|
Re: OO Report
Joe: He had a "wooden receiver", hi ! Jerry
From: "'ljl2002@...' joe_molon@... [070]" <070@...> To: "070@..." <070@...> Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 2:48 PM Subject: Re: [070] OO Report Hey Jerry, Was he QRP? heh heh Joe KA1PPV #1482 On Monday, July 17, 2017 2:26 PM, "Otets Richard rickocr2005@... [070]" <070@...> wrote: BZ Jerry Fr Richard On Monday, July 17, 2017, 2:12:58 PM EDT, Jerry n9avy@... [070] <070@...> wrote: Wow ! Today I received an OO Good Operator Report in mail from an OO in CA. Blocked out his signature/call on purpose. As an OO , I find this really an honor; especially since some 2-lander was complaining about my signal last week ! Jerry N9AVY #454
|
|
|
|
Re: OO Report
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
From: 070@... [mailto:070@...]
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 11:16 AM To: Jerry n9avy@... [070] <070@...> Subject: Re: [070] OO Report
BZ Jerry
Fr Richard
Blocked out his signature/call on purpose. As an OO , I find this really an honor; especially since some 2-lander was complaining about my signal last week !
Jerry N9AVY #454
|
|
|
|
Re: OO Report
I got one several months ago, it might be from the same guy. I was really tickled! Paula K7PAX
On Jul 17, 2017, at 11:12 AM, Jerry n9avy@... [070] <070@...> wrote:
Wow ! Today I received an OO Good Operator Report in mail from an OO in CA. Blocked out his signature/call on purpose. As an OO , I find this really an honor; especially since some 2-lander was complaining about my signal last week ! Jerry N9AVY #454
|
|
|
|
Re: OO Report
ljl2002@att.net
Hey Jerry, Was he QRP? heh heh Joe KA1PPV #1482
On Monday, July 17, 2017 2:26 PM, "Otets Richard rickocr2005@... [070]" <070@...> wrote: BZ Jerry Fr Richard On Monday, July 17, 2017, 2:12:58 PM EDT, Jerry n9avy@... [070] <070@...> wrote: Wow ! Today I received an OO Good Operator Report in mail from an OO in CA. Blocked out his signature/call on purpose. As an OO , I find this really an honor; especially since some 2-lander was complaining about my signal last week ! Jerry N9AVY #454
|
|
|
|
Re: Explain Something for Me
ljl2002@att.net
You were the smart one Mike!!! Joe KA1PPV #1482
On Monday, July 17, 2017 2:16 PM, "Jerry n9avy@... [070]" <070@...> wrote: Joe: Is there any difference between QRP in caps and lowest case ???? Do the caps QRP mean the station is running more power ? Jerry N9AVY From: "'ljl2002@...' joe_molon@... [070]" <070@...> To: "070@..." <070@...> Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 11:17 AM Subject: Re: [070] Explain Something for Me This is the reason that I never sign as /QRP because I heard that it screws up some logging programs. Besides the other Ham is usually surprised to see the power levels when they get the card.. I found it a good practice to watch what I am sending out to catch anything that may not be right so that I can correct it on the next. (I'm not the greatest typist on the planet.) Should have taken typing in HS when I had the chance. The teacher was great and the class was all girls. What an idiot! Joe KA1PPV #1482 On Monday, July 17, 2017 11:30 AM, "mwbesemer@... [070]" <070@...> wrote: Just my humble opinion, but I find that it makes it HARDER to distinguish the call when it's bracketed like that. No telling what it does for guys using screen readers. Mike WM4B On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 11:22 AM, 'K9HW' k9hw@... [070] wrote: Most do it I think to make their callsign stand out from the other text. That's why I do it anyway, but I do leave a space between the brackets and the callsign. All of the software have tried will then recognize that. HRD doesn't have a problem parsing non-alphabetic or numeric characters, so I don't have a problem with those who don't leave spaces. Possibly theirs can parse it as well and it hasn't occurred to them that some out there cannot. Harry, K9HW – #1959 From: 070@... [mailto:070@...] Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 9:12 AM To: 070@... Subject: [070] Explain Something for Me [Harry] <<< DELETED >>> Then there are others who send their call as in brackets. My software does not recognize that as a call sign so I have to cut and paste it or type it in to make a QSO with that station. Why do some stations send their call in brackets? Happy Radio! 73, Bill #1688
|
|
|
|
Re: Utah Grid Needs
W7RIV
Yes, I added that. It is North of Moab on the way to Grand Junction Colorado. It would be a small detour on the Moab (DM58). I see others are adding them as well. That is great. I'll need to do a test mobile setup and then go grab them from time to time. Thanks Bryon, W7RIV
|
|
|
|
Re: DXLab Suite
W7RIV
I went back through these to ensure that I had done them. On number 4, it was checked, which I had interpreted as the intended position. So, I went back to this and unchecked the "Do not save necrypted pages to disk" and ran the sync. This took care of the issue. To make it a little more clear, that you want it unchecked because we want to allow saving of encrypted pages. I did that and it worked as expected now. Thanks, Bryon, W7RIV
|
|
|
|
Re: DXLab Suite
Byron TQSL has nothing to do with downloading only uploads to LOTW. So check your LOTW password and the web address your trying to use. 73 wa4mit Morris
|
|
|
|
Re: DXLab Suite
Bryon-
I don't use DX Lab so haven't had that particular problem....but.... I have had other problems uploading/downloading with IE (many versions). My solution has been to install Chrome and Firefox as well as IE and then use whichever one that works for that particular upload/download. For me it is a toss up which is best. I've had problems with all three. But having the options, I usually find one will work FB when another won't. Hope that helps. Rick - N7WE 070 - #1602
|
|
|
