Date   

Re: Entire Log

Joseph Miller <kj8o.ham@...>
 

Thank you, Milt. I'll give a try tonight.

Looks far easier than what I have been doing :)

VY 73 de Joe


On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 11:40 AM, 'Milton Garb' n6mg@... [070] <070@...> wrote:
 

Jerry, you’re taking it one step too far.

No need to click and scroll down.

Just search for psk31, like I told ya, then when that’s all that’s displayed, hit “Export All Displayed”.

Works for me.

N6MG

 

From: 070@... [mailto:070@...]
Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2015 8:21 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: Re: [070] Entire Log

 

 

With N3FJP, I just click on mode box and enter PSK31 and then "Search".  All the PSK31 QSOs appear.  Then while holding down SHIFT I drag all the way to bottom qso and I now have an adif file to send.

 

Jerry  n9avy

 


From: "Joseph Miller kj8o.ham@... [070]" <070@...>
To: 070@...
Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2015 8:35 AM
Subject: Re: [070] Entire Log

 

 

Excellent question, Dan.

 

I am approaching 34K contacts (all modes). I use ACLog, created a second database, and copied the entire log into the new database. The next step took some time to do, but sort the QSOs by mode, and delete everything that isn't PSK31, leaving me with about 8,000 records instead.

 

The tricky part for me is remembering to go back to the "master" data file when I am finished with the upload, but I have been doing it this way for about a year now, and the difference in processing time makes it worthwhile.

 

Hope this helps,

 

VY 73 de Joe KJ8O 1244

 

 

 

 

On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 9:27 AM, na8w@... [070] <070@...> wrote:

 

I would like to take my entire log and separate out the PSK-31 contacts to put through the checker. Does anyone know of a way to do this? I have tried to take my entire log through the checker a couple times but nothing happens so I assume its too big for it? Around 40K. I put through just my contest log from this past weekend and it went fine and that is all that shows now.

 

Thanks

Darl  NA8W

#1797




--

Joe Miller, KJ8O
Affiliated Club Coordinator

ARRL Michigan Section

 




--
Joe Miller, KJ8O
Affiliated Club Coordinator
ARRL Michigan Section


Re: Entire Log

 

Jerry, you’re taking it one step too far.

No need to click and scroll down.

Just search for psk31, like I told ya, then when that’s all that’s displayed, hit “Export All Displayed”.

Works for me.

N6MG

 

From: 070@... [mailto:070@...]
Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2015 8:21 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: Re: [070] Entire Log

 

 

With N3FJP, I just click on mode box and enter PSK31 and then "Search".  All the PSK31 QSOs appear.  Then while holding down SHIFT I drag all the way to bottom qso and I now have an adif file to send.

 

Jerry  n9avy

 


From: "Joseph Miller kj8o.ham@... [070]" <070@...>
To: 070@...
Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2015 8:35 AM
Subject: Re: [070] Entire Log

 

 

Excellent question, Dan.

 

I am approaching 34K contacts (all modes). I use ACLog, created a second database, and copied the entire log into the new database. The next step took some time to do, but sort the QSOs by mode, and delete everything that isn't PSK31, leaving me with about 8,000 records instead.

 

The tricky part for me is remembering to go back to the "master" data file when I am finished with the upload, but I have been doing it this way for about a year now, and the difference in processing time makes it worthwhile.

 

Hope this helps,

 

VY 73 de Joe KJ8O 1244

 

 

 

 

On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 9:27 AM, na8w@... [070] <070@...> wrote:

 

I would like to take my entire log and separate out the PSK-31 contacts to put through the checker. Does anyone know of a way to do this? I have tried to take my entire log through the checker a couple times but nothing happens so I assume its too big for it? Around 40K. I put through just my contest log from this past weekend and it went fine and that is all that shows now.

 

Thanks

Darl  NA8W

#1797




--

Joe Miller, KJ8O
Affiliated Club Coordinator

ARRL Michigan Section

 


Re: ILLW weekend operating event is approaching

WP4DT-JOSE OSUBA
 

From: Puerto Rico the international lighthouse 15 /16 ausgust 2015 .band 6 a 160 cw, digital mode ,ssb . So get ready for the activation of the lighthouse.

The inf,qrz.com KP4LH IN  Memory of Carlos Torrez KP4UNO (SK)RIP

ATT JOSE OSUBA –WP4DT

 

From: 070@... [mailto:070@...]
Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 9:56 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: [070] ILLW weekend operating event is approaching

 

 

Guys, Gals etc

The International Lighthouse - Lightship Weekend is approaching. It's the 48 hour weekend of August 15-16, 2015.

Let me point out that many lighthouses also have an IOTA # associated with them also. Lightships, however, do not. It's the old "Tierra firma" rule there.

complete info can be found at the ILLW website: www.illw.net - Home . It's a very interesting website with lot's of history, facts, fiction, lists and the where with all to have an intelligent operating weekend. I know that many of the guys chasing our IOTA sticker series will be there. Work a new lighthouse? Work a new IOTA? And keep your eyes open for new LONP folks.

image

illw.net - Home

Official Web Site for the International Lighthouse-Lightship Weekend. An annual amateur radio event held in August.

Preview by Yahoo

I ordered this book and will write a brief review after reading it. My night stand reading material is out of control, so it may be a while.

I'll be back in a few weeks with additional reminders for the ILLW Operating Event. I wont post this on the contest reflector until the week before the event.

Enjoy,

Milt.

N6MG

070-650

LONP #76

070 Club - Dir. of Public Relations

 


Re: Entire Log

Darl DEEDS
 

Thanks Dave I knew I missed something in the help file. Getting too old to see everything. I will work on another upload.
 
Darl  NA8W
 

Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 10:18 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: Re: [070] Entire Log
 
 

http://www.logger32.net/help/index.html
Logger32 -> Logbook Window -> Exporting Logs      and look for the info about "partial log"
   "Selecting this option will expand the windows shown above providing additional options allowing a partial log export based on start and end dates, specific bands and specific modes. The band and mode options allow multiple selections."

 
In Logger32, do File-Export Logs -> ADIF
   And then check the "parital log" checkbox.
 
--david
KJ4IZW
 
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Darl Deeds na8w@... [070] <070@...> wrote:
 
Log is on its way thru ciber land.
 
Darl  NA8W
 
Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 9:32 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: Re: [070] Entire Log
 
 
What logger are you using?   It should have the ability to filter by whatever (band, mode, date, etc) so you get just the PSK QSO's, and export them to ADIF.
 
Try uploading your whole to the checker again, and i'll take a look at it.
 
from the small logyou have on there now, looks like you're using FLDigi 3.22.05 ...
Can a fldigi user post instructions on filter & export?
 
73!
--david
KJ4IZW
 
 
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 9:27 AM, na8w@... [070] <070@...> wrote:
 

I would like to take my entire log and separate out the PSK-31 contacts to put through the checker. Does anyone know of a way to do this? I have tried to take my entire log through the checker a couple times but nothing happens so I assume its too big for it? Around 40K. I put through just my contest log from this past weekend and it went fine and that is all that shows now.


Thanks

Darl  NA8W

#1797

 
 


Re: Entire Log

Jerry N9AVY
 

With N3FJP, I just click on mode box and enter PSK31 and then "Search".  All the PSK31 QSOs appear.  Then while holding down SHIFT I drag all the way to bottom qso and I now have an adif file to send.

Jerry  n9avy



From: "Joseph Miller kj8o.ham@... [070]" <070@...>
To: 070@...
Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2015 8:35 AM
Subject: Re: [070] Entire Log

 
Excellent question, Dan.

I am approaching 34K contacts (all modes). I use ACLog, created a second database, and copied the entire log into the new database. The next step took some time to do, but sort the QSOs by mode, and delete everything that isn't PSK31, leaving me with about 8,000 records instead.

The tricky part for me is remembering to go back to the "master" data file when I am finished with the upload, but I have been doing it this way for about a year now, and the difference in processing time makes it worthwhile.

Hope this helps,

VY 73 de Joe KJ8O 1244




On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 9:27 AM, na8w@... [070] <070@...> wrote:
 
I would like to take my entire log and separate out the PSK-31 contacts to put through the checker. Does anyone know of a way to do this? I have tried to take my entire log through the checker a couple times but nothing happens so I assume its too big for it? Around 40K. I put through just my contest log from this past weekend and it went fine and that is all that shows now.

Thanks
Darl  NA8W
#1797



--
Joe Miller, KJ8O
Affiliated Club Coordinator
ARRL Michigan Section



Re: Another QSL Question

James Ferris <ferris1727@...>
 

That is exactly what I expected and fully agree that it is not valid.  TU all for your input.

73, Jim W5FER


Re: Entire Log

Jerry N9AVY
 

I use N3FJP  and that possible to do with that software thanks to a couple 070 members who showed me how to do it.

Jerry  N9AVY



From: "na8w@... [070]" <070@...>
To: 070@...
Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2015 8:27 AM
Subject: [070] Entire Log

 
I would like to take my entire log and separate out the PSK-31 contacts to put through the checker. Does anyone know of a way to do this? I have tried to take my entire log through the checker a couple times but nothing happens so I assume its too big for it? Around 40K. I put through just my contest log from this past weekend and it went fine and that is all that shows now.

Thanks
Darl  NA8W
#1797



Re: Another QSL Question

Jerry N9AVY
 

Tell the guy you'll QSL that QSO just as soon as FCC makes his new call retroactive to date you worked him  on.  The FCC will send him a dismissal notice.

jerry



From: "Morris Wideman wa4mit@... [070]" <070@...>
To: "070@..." <070@...>
Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2015 8:03 AM
Subject: Re: [070] Another QSL Question

 
Not in my book

de wa4mit



On Wednesday, July 8, 2015 7:56 AM, "James Ferris ferris1727@... [070]" <070@...> wrote:


 
I received an eQSL request from an 070 member who, at the time of the qso, had a call assigned to him that is different than one he is requesting confirmation for.  He upgraded and received a vanity call and now wants a qsl card for his new call.  Is that request valid?

Jim, W5FER





Re: FB - social networking lies

Jerry N9AVY
 

RRR



From: "Matthew King mrk.twg@... [070]" <070@...>
To: 070@...
Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2015 8:05 AM
Subject: Re: [070] Re: FB - social networking lies

 
Hey, guys - I rarely step in to quell a "conversation", but the tenor of the Facebook threads has taken a pretty negative turn, so please let's consider it wrapped up now.

73

Matt King
070 #1708 LONP #261
PODXS 070 Club Executive Director




On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Morris Wideman wa4mit@... [070] <070@...> wrote:
 
Nothing .. but what about when your daughter post a picture of your first grand child smiling while he takes that first step or eating cereal and having it all over their face. I reconnected through FB to 2 former work colleagues whom I had not seen in over 40 years now we stay in touch through FB. So what might you be missing?. 73 de wa4mit



On Wednesday, July 8, 2015 6:55 AM, "kg4kgl@... [070]" <070@...> wrote:


 
 When people post gibberish on FB, please tell me what I am missing by not reading it. 

I get far better interaction on specific forums for interests I share with others. Even that is far from perfect, like actually spending time with people. 

Robert
KG4KGL

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 8, 2015, at 06:42, ve3oij@... [070] <070@...> wrote:

 
You may not consider it social, but you are missing out on a lot by not participating on social networking.  That is the way the world works now, good or bad.

73 de VE3OIJ (49.9 yr old) and yes you can find me on facebook

-pdc






Re: Another QSL Question

Jerry N9AVY
 

Jim:


I would say QSL him for the call you worked him using.

Had this guy worked several DX stations, he'd have to spend a lot of $$$ to get new cards.

BTW , LOTW and others will credit you with current call and any other calls you may have had while at same QTH ...  said that because there are some who operated from DX locations.

Jerry  N9AVY



From: "James Ferris ferris1727@... [070]" <070@...>
To: 070@...
Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2015 7:56 AM
Subject: [070] Another QSL Question

 
I received an eQSL request from an 070 member who, at the time of the qso, had a call assigned to him that is different than one he is requesting confirmation for.  He upgraded and received a vanity call and now wants a qsl card for his new call.  Is that request valid?

Jim, W5FER



Re: FB - social networking lies

Jerry N9AVY
 

You'll miss out on hearing what they had for breakfast !   :-)   :-)   :-)


jerry



From: "kg4kgl@... [070]" <070@...>
To: "070@..." <070@...>
Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2015 6:55 AM
Subject: Re: [070] Re: FB - social networking lies

 
 When people post gibberish on FB, please tell me what I am missing by not reading it. 

I get far better interaction on specific forums for interests I share with others. Even that is far from perfect, like actually spending time with people. 

Robert
KG4KGL

Sent from my iPhone



On Jul 8, 2015, at 06:42, ve3oij@... [070] <070@...> wrote:

 
You may not consider it social, but you are missing out on a lot by not participating on social networking.  That is the way the world works now, good or bad.

73 de VE3OIJ (49.9 yr old) and yes you can find me on facebook

-pdc



Re: Another rant

Jerry N9AVY
 

Yes, I agree that Eqsl is too easy to use. Most of the Eqsls I get are from PSK stations in Europe, many of them are newbies as well.  Part of the problem is , I think, the use of automatic Eqsls which if you don't catch a mistake goes out with that mistake.

I was a QSL Manager back in the day when everyone had paper logs.  I spent a lot of time searching though logs trying to match up QSL cards with log entries ...   some were actually hours off and some were actually a  couple days off. Mostly because people were sloppy about their logs with time keeping. There was actually a case where I received a bunch of cards , one for each band, from a well-known big DX station and some were for bands that the station I managed never operated. No response was ever made. I wasted a lot of hours trying to get people their cards. Oh and one of the stations I managed was making in excess of 25,000 Q's a year !

Back to the Eqsl,  I'm sure there are many bogus entries in LoTW, some are duplicate entries, some are time corrections, some may be "busted" calls and other may be just that some folks don't use LoTW.  I send everyting I work to LoTW. Sometimes I'll get a surprise when I get a confirmation from a station I worked 30 years ago ! Yes, LoTW does have its faults, the main reason is that it's so darned hard to get it up and running, but when it's finally running it works.

Last night I received an apology from one of the 13 Colonies stations:

"Dear N9AVY,
 
My sincere apologies.   No K2x contacts I made were meant to be uploaded to eQSL as (call)  My logging program to my dismay inadvertently and automatically uploaded to eQSL a small number of contacts I made as (call) even though I had set up a separate log identity for K2x.  This was not intentional but an inadvertent computer error.  I did discover this shortly after our QSO and deleted all affected contacts from my eQSL log.  Unfortunately, I did not catch yours before you saw it in your inbox.   Thanks again for emailing me and I appreciate your participation in the Special Event.
 
72,

(call)  "

I left the guys call out so as not to cause any embarrassment.  His actual call was replaced with (call) and of course, I changed the k2 call as well in the above quote.

What I learned over the years is to send out QSLs with accurate information and not guesses.  A few times I have messed up was because MixW does not automatically change bands when I do.That created several errors on my part. Some were kind enough to reject the Eqsl. Others, well... ? (N1MM follows band changes automatically.) 

Even the bureau cards I receive can have errors. Lost a few cards for want of some info being left off.

I always think of QSLing as something which should require accuracy. Like like being a CPA where a decimal point could mean the difference between a hundred bucks or a Million or the wrong account number could make someone a millionaire and another a pauper. But there does need to be standard where almost doesn't count.

Finally.  for me there is no value in Eqsl ... on LoTW I have DXCC 336 and on Eqsl I have less than 200 DXCC countries/entities.  Besides, I only go after ARRL awards.

While I'm at it I should make the comment that while LoTW $ Eqsl have been around the longest, the newcomers that ask me to use QRZ.com or HRD.log or any other service get zero response from me because I regard them as people who jumped on the QSL bandwagon just to "muddy the waters".

Jerry





From: "ve3oij@... [070]" <070@...>
To: 070@...
Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2015 5:39 AM
Subject: [070] Re: Another rant

 
I don't think eQSL is populated by more flakes than LotW or anywhere else.  The difference is that eQSL shows you their flakery, while LotW does not.  It would be interesting to dig into the LotW database and see how many "rejected" QSLs there really are in there.  I think that result would be surprising.

Lots of people make logging errors.  Make no mistake, any eQSLs you reject would have ended up as a paper log back in the day and again, you just wouldn't know about it and wouldn't be able to say "no" to them.  Also, YOU make log errors - maybe you missed logging one... that happens a lot more than you might think with macros.

People say "eQSL has no credibility in DX", but what does that mean?  It's a reasonable log backup place, and it's convenient.  That's the only credibility I've ever assigned it.  In every way I can see it is precisely as credible as Logbook of the World.  In fact, the only substantial difference between LotW and eQSL is that the former can be used for ARRL awards and costs money to do so, whereas the latter can be used for CQ awards and is free to do so.

Do people fudge on eQSL?  Yep.  They fudge paper QSLs too - I just got a paper card from someone for a contact 9 years ago.  Seems his callsign has changed and he's re-issuing cards with the new callsign.  Sorry dude, I didn't make a contact with W1**, I made it with K4***.  Do paper QSLs have credibility in the DX world?

I've never figured out what level of awesomeness would be necessary to get people not to hate on eQSL.  My guess is that it's actually too easy to use - people seem to like the difficulties and hassle that LotW presents.

eQSL... use it... or don't... but don't think there's some kind of high ground by not using it.

73 de VE3OIJ
-pdc



Re: eQSL logging

Dan Morris - KZ3T
 

Paula — Good point and on my digital software that is what I do.  After each QSO it is automatically sent to eQSL but ONLY if I click to LOG the contact.  However, I always wait till the confirmation is made and we exchange info and I know for sure we have made a good contact, then I will LOG the contact and it is sent to eQSL.   A also have these records in my ACLog and could use a bulk upload there instead of using the ‘send to eQSL’ as logged.   

Thanks

Dan Morris   KZ3T   070-1065



On Jul 8, 2015, at 10:15 AM, k7pax@... [070] <070@...> wrote:


I think a lot of eQSL errors are due to automated uploading at the end of each contact (as opposed to a bulk upload at the end of session.) Inaccurate data is collected, or data is prefilled, and not confirmed during the QSO. Then the contact is ended with a macro that automatically logs each contact, whether successful or not. One failsafe would be to use the “Reset” button after a failed contact, but I think common practice is to end a rocky QSO with the usual 73 macro that has “add log” in it, and if the software is set to automatically upload after each QSO, that is probably the source of a lot of these bad QSOs. I turned this feature off and only upload to eQSL and LoTW after the end of my session where I can inspect my log and correct any errors.

Paula K7PAX  #1739







Re: Entire Log

David Westbrook
 

http://www.logger32.net/help/index.html
Logger32 -> Logbook Window -> Exporting Logs      and look for the info about "partial log"
   "Selecting this option will expand the windows shown above providing additional options allowing a partial log export based on start and end dates, specific bands and specific modes. The band and mode options allow multiple selections."


In Logger32, do File-Export Logs -> ADIF
   And then check the "parital log" checkbox.

--david
KJ4IZW

On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Darl Deeds na8w@... [070] <070@...> wrote:
 

Log is on its way thru ciber land.
 
Darl  NA8W
 
Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 9:32 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: Re: [070] Entire Log
 
 

What logger are you using?   It should have the ability to filter by whatever (band, mode, date, etc) so you get just the PSK QSO's, and export them to ADIF.
 
Try uploading your whole to the checker again, and i'll take a look at it.
 
from the small logyou have on there now, looks like you're using FLDigi 3.22.05 ...
Can a fldigi user post instructions on filter & export?
 
73!
--david
KJ4IZW
 
 
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 9:27 AM, na8w@... [070] <070@...> wrote:
 

I would like to take my entire log and separate out the PSK-31 contacts to put through the checker. Does anyone know of a way to do this? I have tried to take my entire log through the checker a couple times but nothing happens so I assume its too big for it? Around 40K. I put through just my contest log from this past weekend and it went fine and that is all that shows now.


Thanks

Darl  NA8W

#1797

 



eQSL logging

k7pax@...
 

I think a lot of eQSL errors are due to automated uploading at the end of each contact (as opposed to a bulk upload at the end of session.) Inaccurate data is collected, or data is prefilled, and not confirmed during the QSO. Then the contact is ended with a macro that automatically logs each contact, whether successful or not. One failsafe would be to use the “Reset” button after a failed contact, but I think common practice is to end a rocky QSO with the usual 73 macro that has “add log” in it, and if the software is set to automatically upload after each QSO, that is probably the source of a lot of these bad QSOs. I turned this feature off and only upload to eQSL and LoTW after the end of my session where I can inspect my log and correct any errors.

Paula K7PAX  #1739


Re: Entire Log

David Westbrook
 

You can browse what other people are using Logger32 ... looks like mostly DX, and a couple USA members.
http://hamclubs.info/070-checker

--david

On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Darl Deeds na8w@... [070] <070@...> wrote:
 

I use Logger 32. I examined it and failed to find a way to filter per mode. I hope it does and I hope I missed reading how.
 
Darl  NA8W
 
Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 9:30 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: RE: [070] Entire Log
 
 

Darl,

What logging software do you use?
Milt.

N6MG

070-650

From: 070@... [mailto:070@...]
Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2015 6:28 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: [070] Entire Log

 

I would like to take my entire log and separate out the PSK-31 contacts to put through the checker. Does anyone know of a way to do this? I have tried to take my entire log through the checker a couple times but nothing happens so I assume its too big for it? Around 40K. I put through just my contest log from this past weekend and it went fine and that is all that shows now.

Thanks

Darl  NA8W

#1797



Re: Entire Log

Darl DEEDS
 

Log is on its way thru ciber land.
 
Darl  NA8W
 

Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 9:32 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: Re: [070] Entire Log
 
 

What logger are you using?   It should have the ability to filter by whatever (band, mode, date, etc) so you get just the PSK QSO's, and export them to ADIF.
 
Try uploading your whole to the checker again, and i'll take a look at it.
 
from the small logyou have on there now, looks like you're using FLDigi 3.22.05 ...
Can a fldigi user post instructions on filter & export?
 
73!
--david
KJ4IZW
 
 
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 9:27 AM, na8w@... [070] <070@...> wrote:
 

I would like to take my entire log and separate out the PSK-31 contacts to put through the checker. Does anyone know of a way to do this? I have tried to take my entire log through the checker a couple times but nothing happens so I assume its too big for it? Around 40K. I put through just my contest log from this past weekend and it went fine and that is all that shows now.


Thanks

Darl  NA8W

#1797

 


Re: Entire Log

Darl DEEDS
 

I used Fldigi for just the 40 sprint so it is not a true example. I will right now turn and try and download the entire log again.
 
Darl  NA8W
 

Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 9:32 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: Re: [070] Entire Log
 
 

What logger are you using?   It should have the ability to filter by whatever (band, mode, date, etc) so you get just the PSK QSO's, and export them to ADIF.
 
Try uploading your whole to the checker again, and i'll take a look at it.
 
from the small logyou have on there now, looks like you're using FLDigi 3.22.05 ...
Can a fldigi user post instructions on filter & export?
 
73!
--david
KJ4IZW
 
 
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 9:27 AM, na8w@... [070] <070@...> wrote:
 

I would like to take my entire log and separate out the PSK-31 contacts to put through the checker. Does anyone know of a way to do this? I have tried to take my entire log through the checker a couple times but nothing happens so I assume its too big for it? Around 40K. I put through just my contest log from this past weekend and it went fine and that is all that shows now.


Thanks

Darl  NA8W

#1797

 


Re: Entire Log

Darl DEEDS
 

I use Logger 32. I examined it and failed to find a way to filter per mode. I hope it does and I hope I missed reading how.
 
Darl  NA8W
 

Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 9:30 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: RE: [070] Entire Log
 
 

Darl,

What logging software do you use?
Milt.

N6MG

070-650

From: 070@... [mailto:070@...]
Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2015 6:28 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: [070] Entire Log

 

I would like to take my entire log and separate out the PSK-31 contacts to put through the checker. Does anyone know of a way to do this? I have tried to take my entire log through the checker a couple times but nothing happens so I assume its too big for it? Around 40K. I put through just my contest log from this past weekend and it went fine and that is all that shows now.

Thanks

Darl  NA8W

#1797


Re: Another QSL Question

boat.anchor@...
 

Jim
I just declined his request as I have not worked the new call.
regads
Barry



---In 070@..., <ferris1727@...> wrote :

I received an eQSL request from an 070 member who, at the time of the qso, had a call assigned to him that is different than one he is requesting confirmation for.  He upgraded and received a vanity call and now wants a qsl card for his new call.  Is that request valid?

Jim, W5FER