Date   

Re: LONP Checker 1.1.2

Phil Barnett <philb@...>
 

On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 4:41 AM, Phil Barnett <philb@philb.us> wrote:


http://www.linuxceptional.com/lonp.php3?content=lonpdown.htm

I'll publish the source code next week if this is the final version.

Source code is published on the above page.


Re: LONP checker 112

Phil Barnett <philb@...>
 

On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Art <wb4mnk@cfl.rr.com> wrote:

Hi Laurie,

Good to hear from you again. I checked these calls and they all have
PSK31 which fall into the dates required LONP. Some of them also have
PSK63 and RTTY modes used. So I do not see any thing wrong.

I'd be happy to review them and tell you why.

Send me the logs and a list of the calls in question and I'll figure it out,
no problem.

Send it to philb at philb dot us.


Re: LONP checker 112

Arthur Petteway
 

Hi Laurie,

Good to hear from you again. I checked these calls and they all have
PSK31 which fall into the dates required LONP. Some of them also have
PSK63 and RTTY modes used. So I do not see any thing wrong.

73,
Art
WB4MNK

On 1/14/2010 3:38 PM, Laurie, VK3AMA wrote:

Art,

Make sure the missing qso's were PSK31. I have been caught out a couple
of times with PSK63.

de Laurie, VK3AMA

wb4mnk@bellsouth.net <mailto:wb4mnk%40bellsouth.net> wrote:
After I verified my LONP count manually I found ten members that I
have had qso's with that LONP checker did not figure in its total. I
tried my MixW log and also my DXKeeper log with the Lonp checker. Now
I am not saying that LONP checker made these mistakes at all because I
feel there is some thing in my log entry that is not correct. I
verified each call in the log to be sure we had made contact and also
verified that I had worked them after they had joined the 070 club.

I need some help finding what is wrong because I have to be missing
some thing. Any one have any suggestions on what I need to check that
could cause LONP checker not to pick these calls up ?

73,
Art
WB4MNK


Re: LONP checker 112

Laurie, VK3AMA <groups7@...>
 

Art,

Make sure the missing qso's were PSK31. I have been caught out a couple of times with PSK63.

de Laurie, VK3AMA

wb4mnk@bellsouth.net wrote:

After I verified my LONP count manually I found ten members that I have had qso's with that LONP checker did not figure in its total. I tried my MixW log and also my DXKeeper log with the Lonp checker. Now I am not saying that LONP checker made these mistakes at all because I feel there is some thing in my log entry that is not correct. I verified each call in the log to be sure we had made contact and also verified that I had worked them after they had joined the 070 club.
I need some help finding what is wrong because I have to be missing some thing. Any one have any suggestions on what I need to check that could cause LONP checker not to pick these calls up ?

73,
Art
WB4MNK


LONP checker 112

Arthur Petteway
 

After I verified my LONP count manually I found ten members that I have had qso's with that LONP checker did not figure in its total. I tried my MixW log and also my DXKeeper log with the Lonp checker. Now I am not saying that LONP checker made these mistakes at all because I feel there is some thing in my log entry that is not correct. I verified each call in the log to be sure we had made contact and also verified that I had worked them after they had joined the 070 club.

I need some help finding what is wrong because I have to be missing some thing. Any one have any suggestions on what I need to check that could cause LONP checker not to pick these calls up ?

73,
Art
WB4MNK


Re: Survey/Pole - Please vote

Scotty W7PSK
 

It was missing My combo, so I used the Horizontal for High and Wire for low.

I actually have Horizontal for 10/15/20 and a HF6V (with 6m add on) for the rest.

----- Original Message ----
From: Brad - K7PWL <k7pwl@arrl.net>
To: 070@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thu, January 14, 2010 10:28:55 AM
Subject: RE: [070] Survey/Pole - Please vote

Just took the poll and would love to have been able to answer 'right-left
for other planet contacts' ... If someone makes that happen, that would be
the most cool DX ever!!

//Brad

_____

From: Sly G [mailto:w6qe@verizon.net]
Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 8:02 AM
To: 070@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [070] Survey/Pole - Please vote




Hello everybody,
Just a reminder that there's a new survey/pole at our 070 website. Please
take a moment and participate? The results will be very interesting and
useful if we can get enough participants.

http://www.podxs070 .com/

Thanks,
Milton
W6QE
070-650










------------------------------------

Check out the 070 Club website at for the latest
information on 070 Club activities.



Yahoo! Groups Links



Re: Survey/Pole - Please vote

k7pwl
 

Just took the poll and would love to have been able to answer 'right-left
for other planet contacts' ... If someone makes that happen, that would be
the most cool DX ever!!

//Brad

_____

From: Sly G [mailto:w6qe@verizon.net]
Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 8:02 AM
To: 070@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [070] Survey/Pole - Please vote




Hello everybody,
Just a reminder that there's a new survey/pole at our 070 website. Please
take a moment and participate? The results will be very interesting and
useful if we can get enough participants.

http://www.podxs070 <http://www.podxs070.com/> .com/

Thanks,
Milton
W6QE
070-650


Re: LONP Checker 1.1.2

 

Phil Barnett wrote:
I did finish the call scrubber screen, so the full automation and
detection of calls that need to be scrubbed is working.
Well done, it worked great for me! It matches all my contacts at my current LONP level and finds 3 more new contacts than the previous version.

Darrell N3JWJ


Survey/Pole - Please vote

Sly G <w6qe@...>
 

Hello everybody,
Just a reminder that there's a new survey/pole at our 070 website. Please take a moment and participate? The results will be very interesting and useful if we can get enough participants.

http://www.podxs070.com/

Thanks,
Milton
W6QE
070-650


LONP Checker 1.1.2

Phil Barnett <philb@...>
 

After extensive feedback and testing, we have what should be the final
version for a while.

I did finish the call scrubber screen, so the full automation and
detection of calls that need to be scrubbed is working. The first time
you run your logs through, you will be prompted to select the call from
the mixed call. Once you make the selection, it is put into the
permanent call scrubbing list so you don't have to answer the question
again.

http://www.linuxceptional.com/lonp.php3?content=lonpdown.htm

I'll publish the source code next week if this is the final version.

Thanks for any feedback.

P.S. I was not able to get to the LONP submissions form sorting problem.
I need it to be in the order it is sorted in to do the proper
submission.


Re: 070 endorsements checker

David Westbrook
 

===> W7PSK and Anyone else that had a "out of memory" problem, your report's
been re-generated an you can click on "View Report" next to your callsign
at:
http://dwestbrook.net/projects/ham/070-checker/

Also you'll see extra stats there now, including qso count and logging
program.


The QSO limit should be much much higher now ... i temporarily removed the
LONP and WorldRadio 31-31 checks (both of which were just nice-to-haves
anyways) -- they were the memory hogs that were causing the qso limit to be
so low ...


thanks all for the great testing!

--david
KJ4IZW

On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:38 PM, w7psk <w7psk@yahoo.com> wrote:



I too Broke it with Out of Memory :(

Scotty W7PSK



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Re: 070 endorsements checker

Scotty W7PSK
 

I too Broke it with Out of Memory :(

Scotty W7PSK


Re: IOTA endorsement question

AG4CZ <ag4cz@...>
 

grumble grumble....I think it's different islands not just contacts. So, me thinks, only one Cuban will count, grumble :)
John, AG4CZ
070 #2

--- In 070@yahoogroups.com, Justin Mattes--KC2GIK <kc2gik@...> wrote:

Grumble grumble grumble.......took away two of my contacts. I have Where
are those Cuban stations when you need them? I'm back down to 7 stations ;)
Justin,KC2GIK
070 #751




Milton Garb wrote:

Nice try Justin... :-)
It's different stations, regardless of band.
I have an Excell form under FILES to assist you in applying.
Milton
W6QE
070-650
----- Original Message -----
From: Justin Mattes--KC2GIK
To: 070 Group
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 2:52 PM
Subject: [070] IOTA endorsement question

For the IOTA endorsement, does the SAME station on a DIFFERENT Band
count?? Or the same station on the same band but DIFFERENT TIMES?

'Justin,KC2GIK
070 #751

P.S. K4ORY I would like a sked if possible.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Re: IOTA endorsement question

Justin Mattes--KC2GIK
 

Grumble grumble grumble.......took away two of my contacts. I have Where are those Cuban stations when you need them? I'm back down to 7 stations ;)
Justin,KC2GIK
070 #751




Milton Garb wrote:


Nice try Justin... :-)
It's different stations, regardless of band.
I have an Excell form under FILES to assist you in applying.
Milton
W6QE
070-650
----- Original Message -----
From: Justin Mattes--KC2GIK
To: 070 Group
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 2:52 PM
Subject: [070] IOTA endorsement question

For the IOTA endorsement, does the SAME station on a DIFFERENT Band
count?? Or the same station on the same band but DIFFERENT TIMES?

'Justin,KC2GIK
070 #751

P.S. K4ORY I would like a sked if possible.



Re: IOTA endorsement question

Milton Garb <w6qe@...>
 

Nice try Justin... :-)
It's different stations, regardless of band.
I have an Excell form under FILES to assist you in applying.
Milton
W6QE
070-650

----- Original Message -----
From: Justin Mattes--KC2GIK
To: 070 Group
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 2:52 PM
Subject: [070] IOTA endorsement question



For the IOTA endorsement, does the SAME station on a DIFFERENT Band
count?? Or the same station on the same band but DIFFERENT TIMES?

'Justin,KC2GIK
070 #751

P.S. K4ORY I would like a sked if possible.


IOTA endorsement question

Justin Mattes--KC2GIK
 

For the IOTA endorsement, does the SAME station on a DIFFERENT Band count?? Or the same station on the same band but DIFFERENT TIMES?

'Justin,KC2GIK
070 #751

P.S. K4ORY I would like a sked if possible.


LONP

Ruben
 

Looks like I have 101 for LONP so I'll be dropping it in the mail.
I used LONP Checker.
 Ruben Echevarria KA2HHB
070 Club#861 30MDG#1148
10-10#33308


Re: 070 endorsements checker

Stu MM0BSM
 

Hi David

MM0BSM - out of memory w/18,257 .. I ran manually -- you can click 'View
Report' (don't re-upload)
--david
KJ4IZW
Hope it helps and thanks for doing it manually

Stu MM0BSM
----------


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.725 / Virus Database: 270.14.138/2618 - Release Date: 01/13/10 07:35:00


Re: 070 endorsements checker

David Westbrook
 

If there are additional ADIF fields they'll just be ignored if they're
not used for any of the award requirements.

--david

On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Justin Mattes--KC2GIK
<kc2gik@justinmattes.com> wrote:
IT WORKS GREAT!! Might I suggest you add a column for lighthouse #'s??
Justin, KC2GIK

David Westbrook wrote:

The checker is looking for these ADIF fields:
call
band (i have as a TODO to calculate band from 'freq' if necessary)
mode
qso_date
time_on
dxcc -- the dxcc_id .. if there's a field that gives the prefix,
e.g. app_dxkeeper_dxccprefix, i can work with that, too
state -- for K/VE/VK awards
iota -- for the IOTA award
cont -- for the WAC award
gridsquare -- for the PSK Golf award

--david

On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Justin Mattes--KC2GIK
<kc2gik@justinmattes.com <mailto:kc2gik%40justinmattes.com>> wrote:
David,
What are the req uired ADIF fields?? Does every field need to have a
value??
Justin
KC2GIK
David Westbrook wrote:

Have already had a few tests so far ...

HP2SM and K0ABC -- yours failed the first time, but I fixed the
bug (each log had a qso with a dxcc id set to 0, which cause it to
error out) and re-ran -- You can view your reports now.
http://dwestbrook.net/projects/ham/070-checker/
<http://dwestbrook.net/projects/ham/070-checker/>
<http://dwestbrook.net/projects/ham/070-checker/
<http://dwestbrook.net/projects/ham/070-checker/>>

W6QE -- it ran out of memory with your log :( .. i'll work on making
it more memory efficient ...

KO4PU and AG4QX -- looks like i need to tweak some things for MixW
and HRD logs .. i'll post back here when i've fixed it and
re-generated your reports.

thanks for the fast testing!!!
--david
KJ4IZW

On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 8:48 AM, David Westbrook
<dwestbrook@gmail.com <mailto:dwestbrook%40gmail.com>
<mailto:dwestbrook%40gmail.com>> wrote:
The recent discussions/improvements of the LONP checker have inspired
me to polish up a program I started a little while back for
fun/personal use ...

http://dwestbrook.net/projects/ham/070-checker
<http://dwestbrook.net/projects/ham/070-checker>
<http://dwestbrook.net/projects/ham/070-checker
<http://dwestbrook.net/projects/ham/070-checker>>

This will take your ADIF file and display the progress for all of the
endorsements listed here:
http://www.podxs070.com/endorsements-available
<http://www.podxs070.com/endorsements-available>
<http://www.podxs070.com/endorsements-available
<http://www.podxs070.com/endorsements-available>>

It's brand new and shiny, so please be gentle :) I've only tested it
with a small (200 qso's) file, and only generated from DXKeeper.
ADIF's from other sources would be much appreciated, so i can make
sure i'm parsing correctly. I'll keep an eye on it as people try it,
and try to proactively find/fix issues.

This is somewhat a proof-of-concept, but I hope that it's useful to
someone, and points out a completed or near-completed endorsement you
weren't aware of. There's an example report (my log) listed on there,
so you can see what the format is w/o having to upload.

Disclaimer: the criteria I'm checking may not be 100% accurate (e.g.
membership date logic isn't implemented, or there could be a bug!)
Everything from http://www.podxs070.com/endorsements-available
<http://www.podxs070.com/endorsements-available>
<http://www.podxs070.com/endorsements-available
<http://www.podxs070.com/endorsements-available>> or the
award manager or the LONP checker takes precedence -- this is not
intended to replace any of those.

Any questions/comments/suggestions/discussion are more than welcome!

thanks,
--david
KJ4IZW
dwestbrook@gmail.com <mailto:dwestbrook%40gmail.com>
<mailto:dwestbrook%40gmail.com>


------------------------------------

Check out the 070 Club website at <http://www.podxs070.com/
<http://www.podxs070.com/>> for the latest information on 070 Club
activities.



Yahoo! Groups Links





------------------------------------

Check out the 070 Club website at <http://www.podxs070.com/> for the latest information on 070 Club activities.



Yahoo! Groups Links




Re: 070 endorsements checker

Justin Mattes--KC2GIK
 

IT WORKS GREAT!! Might I suggest you add a column for lighthouse #'s??
Justin, KC2GIK

David Westbrook wrote:


The checker is looking for these ADIF fields:
call
band (i have as a TODO to calculate band from 'freq' if necessary)
mode
qso_date
time_on
dxcc -- the dxcc_id .. if there's a field that gives the prefix,
e.g. app_dxkeeper_dxccprefix, i can work with that, too
state -- for K/VE/VK awards
iota -- for the IOTA award
cont -- for the WAC award
gridsquare -- for the PSK Golf award

--david

On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Justin Mattes--KC2GIK
<kc2gik@justinmattes.com <mailto:kc2gik%40justinmattes.com>> wrote:
David,
What are the req uired ADIF fields?? Does every field need to have a
value??
Justin
KC2GIK
David Westbrook wrote:

Have already had a few tests so far ...

HP2SM and K0ABC -- yours failed the first time, but I fixed the
bug (each log had a qso with a dxcc id set to 0, which cause it to
error out) and re-ran -- You can view your reports now.
http://dwestbrook.net/projects/ham/070-checker/
<http://dwestbrook.net/projects/ham/070-checker/>
<http://dwestbrook.net/projects/ham/070-checker/
<http://dwestbrook.net/projects/ham/070-checker/>>

W6QE -- it ran out of memory with your log :( .. i'll work on making
it more memory efficient ...

KO4PU and AG4QX -- looks like i need to tweak some things for MixW
and HRD logs .. i'll post back here when i've fixed it and
re-generated your reports.

thanks for the fast testing!!!
--david
KJ4IZW

On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 8:48 AM, David Westbrook
<dwestbrook@gmail.com <mailto:dwestbrook%40gmail.com>
<mailto:dwestbrook%40gmail.com>> wrote:
The recent discussions/improvements of the LONP checker have inspired
me to polish up a program I started a little while back for
fun/personal use ...

http://dwestbrook.net/projects/ham/070-checker
<http://dwestbrook.net/projects/ham/070-checker>
<http://dwestbrook.net/projects/ham/070-checker
<http://dwestbrook.net/projects/ham/070-checker>>

This will take your ADIF file and display the progress for all of the
endorsements listed here:
http://www.podxs070.com/endorsements-available
<http://www.podxs070.com/endorsements-available>
<http://www.podxs070.com/endorsements-available
<http://www.podxs070.com/endorsements-available>>

It's brand new and shiny, so please be gentle :) I've only tested it
with a small (200 qso's) file, and only generated from DXKeeper.
ADIF's from other sources would be much appreciated, so i can make
sure i'm parsing correctly. I'll keep an eye on it as people try it,
and try to proactively find/fix issues.

This is somewhat a proof-of-concept, but I hope that it's useful to
someone, and points out a completed or near-completed endorsement you
weren't aware of. There's an example report (my log) listed on there,
so you can see what the format is w/o having to upload.

Disclaimer: the criteria I'm checking may not be 100% accurate (e.g.
membership date logic isn't implemented, or there could be a bug!)
Everything from http://www.podxs070.com/endorsements-available
<http://www.podxs070.com/endorsements-available>
<http://www.podxs070.com/endorsements-available
<http://www.podxs070.com/endorsements-available>> or the
award manager or the LONP checker takes precedence -- this is not
intended to replace any of those.

Any questions/comments/suggestions/discussion are more than welcome!

thanks,
--david
KJ4IZW
dwestbrook@gmail.com <mailto:dwestbrook%40gmail.com>
<mailto:dwestbrook%40gmail.com>


------------------------------------

Check out the 070 Club website at <http://www.podxs070.com/
<http://www.podxs070.com/>> for the latest information on 070 Club activities.



Yahoo! Groups Links