I've asked this question before and never got a straight answer. Why can't
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
the CW folks be forced to give up some of their porti[on of the bands?
Digital modes have become more popular, why can't folks change with the
times? More digital modes should mean more frequency allocation
On Mon, April 22, 2019 10:12 pm, Dan Morris wrote:
Yes it is
Dan Morris KZ3T 070-1065
I live to live for Him!
On Apr 22, 2019, at 5:36 PM, Jim K5SP <email@example.com> wrote:
Isn't 30m psk on 10.140?
Encroachment on 30 just like on 17!!!
On 4/22/2019 3:14 PM, Steve R via Groups.Io wrote:
Randy I found the FT4 protocol release notes. It is set as a primarily--
contest mode and the transmit cycle goes from 12.64 seconds to 4.48.
Currently the recommended frequencies are above FT8...3.595, 7.090,
10.140, 14.140, 18.104, 21.140 and 28.180.
Iâ€™ll post the link when I get to my main computer. I think we are
still safe...for now.
On Apr 22, 2019, at 15:29, Randy True <firstname.lastname@example.org
Just got a notice from the FT8 Facebook group that they will be
unveiling a new mode ; FT4, at the end of the month. Basically a
faster FT8 that is meant for contesters. Let's hope we don't get
further encroached upon.
Jim, K5SP #483
Member Services Director