Re: Section Manager Response Re: FT8


JEFF WALSH
 

All things have a habit of working themselves out in the end .... give it time
 
JEFF WALSH
W3WMU
#1673
BUBBAWOOD
WORLDWIDE HEADQUARTERS
STURGIS, MS.


On Monday, April 9, 2018 8:31 PM, Stephen Melachrinos <melachri@...> wrote:


And three rights make a left!


-----Original Message-----
From: Jerry N9AVY <n9avy@...>
To: 070Club <070Club@groups.io>
Sent: Mon, Apr 9, 2018 9:28 pm
Subject: Re: [070Club] Section Manager Response Re: FT8

But two rights make an airplane !
 
 



From: Mike Besemer - WM4B #348 <mwbesemer@...>
To: 070Club@groups.io
Sent: Monday, April 9, 2018 8:19 PM
Subject: Re: [070Club] Section Manager Response Re: FT8

No... two wrongs don't make a right.  I was raised better than that.

Mike
WM4B

-----Original Message-----
From: 070Club@groups.io [mailto:070Club@groups.io] On Behalf Of Justin Mattes--KC2GIK
Sent: Monday, April 9, 2018 9:16 PM
Subject: Re: [070Club] Section Manager Response Re: FT8

Which is why we need to invade to CW band to get their attention. I have been saying this for a long time now and it goes unnoticed Justin KC2GIK
> They were sure flying the FT8 flag high and proud when the mode came
> out, but now that it’s becoming a headache they want to wash their
> hands of it.  Go figure.
>
> He’s right about the OO program, but it was broke before the FCC
> totally quit enforcement.  That’s why I turned in my credentials.
>
> So much for representing the hobby.
>
> Mike
> WM4B
>
> From: 070Club@groups.io [mailto:070Club@groups.io] On Behalf Of Jim
> K5SP
> Sent: Monday, April 9, 2018 4:51 PM
> Subject: [070Club] Section Manager Response Re: FT8
>
> This is what I received from the NTX section Manage to my message to
> him regarding the FT8 issues:
>
> Jim,
>
> I am not sure what I can do to help. I bet many of these stateside FT8
> operators are newbies and may not even be members of the league.
>
> The OO program is basically dead at this point due to FCC dysfunction.
>
>
> The ARRL has no standing to pressure another company to do anything.
>
>
> The OO program would probably be the best bet. I am CC'ing the NTX OOC
> on this reply.
>
>
> You could also write an article for QRZ--
>
> 1. If the OO program is "Dead", why would the OO program be the best bet?
> 2. Anyone want to write a QRZ article?
> 3. Would agree ARRL has no official standing, but, are they not acting
> like a PAC with the FCC?  They can and do lobby for what they think is
> in the best interest of hams (or what will line their pockets).
>
> --
> Jim,  K5SP #483
> Member Services Director
>
>
>
>
>
>



Justin Mattes-KC2GIK










Virus-free. www.avg.com


Join main@070Club.groups.io to automatically receive all group messages.