Re: Section Manager Response Re: FT8

Mike Besemer - WM4B #348 <mwbesemer@...>

No... two wrongs don't make a right. I was raised better than that.


-----Original Message-----
From: [] On Behalf Of Justin Mattes--KC2GIK
Sent: Monday, April 9, 2018 9:16 PM
Subject: Re: [070Club] Section Manager Response Re: FT8

Which is why we need to invade to CW band to get their attention. I have been saying this for a long time now and it goes unnoticed Justin KC2GIK
They were sure flying the FT8 flag high and proud when the mode came
out, but now that it’s becoming a headache they want to wash their
hands of it. Go figure.

He’s right about the OO program, but it was broke before the FCC
totally quit enforcement. That’s why I turned in my credentials.

So much for representing the hobby.


From: [] On Behalf Of Jim
Sent: Monday, April 9, 2018 4:51 PM
Subject: [070Club] Section Manager Response Re: FT8

This is what I received from the NTX section Manage to my message to
him regarding the FT8 issues:


I am not sure what I can do to help. I bet many of these stateside FT8
operators are newbies and may not even be members of the league.

The OO program is basically dead at this point due to FCC dysfunction.

The ARRL has no standing to pressure another company to do anything.

The OO program would probably be the best bet. I am CC'ing the NTX OOC
on this reply.

You could also write an article for QRZ--

1. If the OO program is "Dead", why would the OO program be the best bet?
2. Anyone want to write a QRZ article?
3. Would agree ARRL has no official standing, but, are they not acting
like a PAC with the FCC? They can and do lobby for what they think is
in the best interest of hams (or what will line their pockets).

Jim, K5SP #483
Member Services Director

Justin Mattes-KC2GIK

Join to automatically receive all group messages.