Re: South Dakota

Randy True

Good luck,

I've been waiting 2 1/2 months for my subscription to start.

Randy W4RTT

From: 070@... <070@...> on behalf of 'Mike Besemer' mwbesemer@... [070] <070@...>
Sent: Saturday, November 4, 2017 11:23 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: RE: [070] Re: South Dakota

I miss 73 magazine. Wayne’s editorials were always entertaining – and often wacky!

Good construction articles too.

I subscribed to the digital edition of CQ several year ago, but found myself not reading it. I much prefer a paper copy to digital print; might have to subscribe again.


From: 070@... [mailto:070@...]
Sent: Saturday, November 4, 2017 11:03 AM
To: 070@...
Subject: Re: [070] Re: South Dakota

Thought CQ went the way of 73 magazine....

From: "'ljl2002@...' joe_molon@... [070]" <070@...>
To: "070@..." <070@...>
Sent: Saturday, November 4, 2017 9:56 AM
Subject: Re: [070] Re: South Dakota

PODXS Group,

There is a very interesting article in the September issue of CQ that deals with the problem of one station not seeing the other.
It is : Is HF Propagation Reciprocal? by Thomas Hood NW7US. It explains why the RF doesn't always go both ways on the same path.

I guess what is good for the goose is not always good for the gander when dealing with HF.

KA1PPV #1482

On Friday, November 3, 2017 8:18 PM, "boat.anchor@... [070]" <070@...> wrote:


---In 070@..., wrote :
I see him but he can't see me
On Nov 3, 2017, at 6:59 PM, "boat.anchor@... [070]" <070@...> wrote:

Not seen here but CQn

---In 070@..., wrote :

Anyone needs South Dakota AE0WM is on 20 meters
KI4VMK # 2542

Join to automatically receive all group messages.